Page 103 - Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century
P. 103

Educating the Engineer of 2020:  Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century
  http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11338.html


                86                             EDUCATING THE ENGINEER OF 2020


                                        OVERVIEW
                   There has been a great deal of interest in a review of the EEC Pro-
               gram that would tell what was done, what worked, and what did not
               work. The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) requested a con-
               cise overview of the program to support its Engineer of 2020 Project,
               which will define how engineering in the twenty-first century will be
               refashioned. To assist NAE, we consider results from the EEC Program
               through four different “lenses”:

                   •   Content. Through this lens we describe new topics that might
                       be included in engineering curricula.
                   •   Expectations. We chose the word “expectations” instead of out-
                       comes, objectives, goals, student outcomes, learning objectives,
                       assessments, or evaluations, all of which might have precon-
                       ceived meanings that could interfere with an objective descrip-
                       tion of expectations for engineering graduates. Issues associated
                       with expectations include assessment and evaluation, because it
                       must be determined if stated expectations have been met. In
                       this respect, the expectation lens is similar to the testing lens for
                       engineering design; testing requires not only specifications, but
                       also methods of determining whether a product sample satis-
                       fies specifications. Other issues associated with expectations in-
                       clude retention of students and increased participation of
                       underrepresented groups. Improvements in both areas were
                       goals of the EEC Program.
                   •   Methodology. The word “methodology” is used because read-
                       ers might have preconceived ideas about the meaning of other
                       words (e.g., pedagogy, teaching, classroom practice, and class-
                       room approaches) that might interfere with an understanding
                       of how expectations might be realized and/or improved. Issues
                       associated with the methodology lens include pedagogy, lec-
                       tures versus more active student engagement, and instructional
                       technology.
                   •   Systemic reform. This is the most complex lens, and the most
                       fundamental, because significant investments were made in
                       hopes that reforms initiated in a particular EEC would have
                       major positive effects well beyond the schools directly involved
                       in that coalition.








                      Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108