Page 104 - Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century
P. 104

Educating the Engineer of 2020:  Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century
  http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11338.html



             THE ENGINEERING EDUCATION COALITIONS PROGRAM              87

                                   The Content Lens
                 Content addresses questions such as new topics for engineering cur-
             ricula and in what order topics should be presented. Questions about
             content can often be answered by textbooks. The EEC Program con-
             tributed surprisingly little new content. EECs invested comparatively
             little effort in adding topics to engineering curricula or in reordering
             existing subject matter. This may seem surprising considering that new
             technological areas (e.g., information technology, biotechnology,
             nanotechnology, sustainable engineering, etc.) are continuously emerg-
             ing. Various explanations might be offered for the comparatively small
             investments in content.
                 First, engineering curricula have reached topical capacity. Thus,
             adding new topics at this point would require eliminating other topics,
             and reaching consensus on which topics are the most important is a
             difficult and contentious process. Second, EECs were intended to ad-
             dress questions associated with engineering education as a system; topi-
             cal additions and/or deletions raise questions for individual disciplines,
             rather than for engineering as a whole. Third, adding new topics may
             not have appeared to be as pressing a challenge as increasing the number
             of engineering graduates, raising retention rates for students already in
             engineering, increasing the percentages of students from traditionally
             underrepresented groups, such as white women and minorities, and
             improving students’ capabilities in communications, teamwork, prob-
             lem solving, ethics, engineering design, project management, and life-
             long learning. Changes in content would not have addressed these needs.
                 Given that the results of the EEC program in terms of content were
             comparatively small and given the preeminence attached to content by
             people associated with engineering, some might conclude that the EEC
             Program contributed little to engineering education. We hope that con-
             clusion will be reversed when the program is looked at through the
             other lenses.


                                 The Expectations Lens

                 Each EEC first articulated expectations for graduates of engineer-
             ing education programs, refined them to the point that assessment
             methods could be formulated and implemented, and then shared their
             expertise and experience associated with these processes nationwide.








                      Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109