Page 90 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J

The Small Group as a System 73

Problem Solving: A Participant-Generated Agenda 23. Jennifer H. Waldeck, Carolyn A. Shepard, Jeremy
for Small Group Research,” Small Group Research, Teitelbaum, W. Jeffrey Farrar, and David Seibold,
26 (February 1995): 25–55; Cynthia Stohl and “New Directions for Functional, Symbolic
Michael E. Holmes, “A Functional Perspective for Convergence, Structuration, and Bona Fide Group
Bona Fide Groups,” Communication Yearbook, 16 Perspectives of Group Communication,” in New
(1993): 601–14; Jeremy Rose, “Communication Directions in Group Communication, ed. Lawrence
Challenges and Role Functions of Performing R. Frey (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002): 3–24.
Groups,” Small Group Research, 25 (August 1994): 24. Cynthia Stohl and Kasey Walker, “A Bona Fide
411–32. Perspective for the Future of Groups,” in New
18. Broome and Fulbright, “A Multistage Influence Directions in Group Communication, ed. Lawrence
Model.” R. Frey (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002): 237–52.
19. Randy Y. Hirokawa and Joann Keyton, “Perceived 25. Ibid.
Facilitators and Inhibitors of Effectiveness in 26. Charlene Solomon, “The Challenge of Working
Organizational Work Teams,” Management in Virtual Teams: Virtual Teams Survey Report
Communication Quarterly, 8 (May 1995): 424–46. 2010,” RW3 Culture Wizard, http://www
20. Frances A. Kennedy, Misty L. Loughry, Thomas .communicationcache.com/uploads/1/0/8/8
P. Klammer, and Michael M. Beyerlein, “Effects of /10887248/the_challenges_of_working_in_virtual_
Organizational Support on Potency in Work Teams: teams.pdf.
The Mediating Role of Team Processes,” Small 27. Stohl and Walker, “A Bona Fide Perspective for the
Group Research, 40 (February 2009): 72–93. Future of Groups.”
21. The information about bona fide group theory is 28. Stephanie Johnson, Kenneth Bettenhausen, and
synthesized from the following sources: Linda Ellie Gibbons, “Realities of Working in Virtual
L. Putnam and Cynthia Stohl, “Bona Fide Groups: Teams: Affective and Attitudinal Outcomes of
A Reconceptualization of Groups in Context,” Using Computer-Mediated Communication,”
Communication Studies, 41 (1990): 248–65; Linda Small Group Research, 40 (2009): 623–49.
L. Putnam and Cynthia Stohl, “Bona Fide Groups: 29. Nader Ebrahim, Shamsuddin Ahmed, and Zahari
An Alternative Perspective for Communication and Taha, “Virtual Teams: A Literature Review,”
Small Group Decision Making,” in Communication Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3
and Group Decision Making, 2nd ed., eds. Randy (2009): 2653–669.
Y. Hirokawa and M. Scott Poole (Thousand Oaks, 30. Ibid.
CA: Sage, 1996): 147–78; Lawrence R. Frey, 31. Deborah G. Ancona and David F. Caldwell,
“Group Communication in Context: Studying Bona “Beyond Task and Maintenance: Defining External
Fide Groups,” in Group Communication in Context: Functions in Groups,” Group & Organization
Studies of Bona Fide Groups, 2nd ed., ed. Lawrence Studies, 13 (December 1988): 468–94.
R. Frey (Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum, 2003): 1–20; 32. Anat Drach-Zahavy and Anit Somech, “From
and Cynthia Stohl and Linda L. Putnam, an Intrateam to an Interteam Perspective of
“Communication in Bona Fide Groups: A Effectiveness: The Role of Interdependence and
Retrospective and Prospective Account,” in Group Boundary Activities,” Small Group Research 41
Communication in Context: Studies of Bona Fide (April 2010): 143–74.
Groups, 2nd ed., ed. Lawrence R. Frey (Mahway, 33. Ancona and Caldwell, “Bridging the Boundary:
NJ: Erlbaum, 2003): 399–414. External Activity and Performance in Organizational
22. Deborah G. Ancona and David F. Caldwell, Teams.”
“Bridging the Boundary: External Activity 34. Ibid.
and Performance in Organizational Teams,” 35. Haslett and Ogilive, “Feedback Processes in Task
Administrative Science Quarterly, 37 (December Groups.”
1992): 634–65.

gal37018_ch03_051_074.indd 73 3/28/18 12:34 PM