Page 137 -
P. 137

114    5. Reduction mod p and Torsion Points

                                       2
                                                                3
                                                   2
                          3
                      = x + a 2 (cx + b)x + a 4 (cx + b) x + a 6 (cx + b) .
        Collecting coefficients of powers of x, we have the following first two terms:

                        3            2      3
                   0 = x  1 + a 2 c + a 4 c + a 6 c

                          2                  2          2
                      + x   a 2 b + 2a 4 bc + 3a 6 bc − a 1 c − a 3 c  +· · · .

        The sum of the roots of this cubic equation in x is x + x + x the x-coordinates of

        P, P ,and P and is given by the following expression:


                                                   2
                                  a 2 b + 2a 4 bc + 3a 6 bc − a 1 c − a 3 c 2

                    x + x + x =−                               .
                                                   2
                                       1 + a 2 c + a 4 c + a 6 c 3
        Since the denominator is of the form 1 + u where ord p (u)> 0, we see that
                                                  3
                                            2
                            ord p (1 + a 2 c + a 4 c + a 6 c ) = 0.

        From the relations ord p (b) ≥ 3n and ord p (c) ≥ 2n, we deduce that ord p (x + x +

        x ) ≥ 2n.
           For the last statement of the proposition observe that






               ord p (x ) ≥ min ord p (x + x + x ), ord p (−x), ord p (−x ) ≥ n.

        Since w = cx + b, or from (4.1), it is now clear that ord p (w ) ≥ 3n and the point
        (w , x , 1) is in E (n) (k). This proves the proposition.


        (4.4) Remark. At the end of the proof of the previous proposition, we see that


        ord p (x + x + x ) ≥ 3n whenever a 1 = 0, so that the term a 1 c is not in the nu-


        merator of the expression for x + x + x .
        (4.5) Theorem. Let E be an elliptic curve over k defined by a cubic in normal
        form with p-adic filtration E (n) (k) on E(k). The subsets E (n) (k) are subgroups.
                                                            n
        The function P = (w, x, 1)  → x(P) = x defined E (n) (k) → p R composed with
                                             n
                                                  2n
                                     n
        the canonical quotient morphism p R → p R/p R defines a groupmorphism
                    n
                         2n
        E (n) (k) → p R/p R with kernel in E (2n) (k) and it induces a monomorphism
                           n
                                2n
        E (n) (R)/E (2n) (k) → p R/p R for n ≥ 1.
        Proof. For the first statement observe that the condition on P = (w, x, 1) where
        ord p (w) ≥ 3n and ord p (x) ≥ n is equivalent for the coordinates P(1, x, y) to the
        condition ord p (x) ≤−2n and ord p (y) ≤−3n. Since
                           −(1, x, y) = (1, x, −y − a 1 x − a 3 ),
        it follows that the sets E (n) (k) are stable under taking inverse of elements. This to-
        gether with (4.3) implies that E (n) (k) is a subgroup for n ≥ 1.
           For the second statement, consider PQ = T . By (4.3) we have
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142