Page 138 -
P. 138

§5. Torsion in Elliptic Curves over Q: Nagell–Lutz Theorem  115

                                                      2n
                          x(P) + x(Q) + x(T ) ≡ 0mod p R,
        and this means that
                                                          2n
                      x(P + Q) + x(T ) ≡ x(P) + x(Q)  mod p R.
                                           2n
        For the last statement note that x(P) ∈ p R if and only if P ∈ E (2n) (k). This
        proves the theorem.

        (4.6) Remark. The above result can be modified when a 1 = 0togiveaninjection
                                              n
                                  E (n) (k)  p R
                                          →      .
                                              3n
                                  E (3n) (k)  p R
        In the next section we will see one case where this modification is useful.

        Exercises

         1. Carry out the proofs of the modifications indicated in (4.4) and (4.6).
         2. Using the notations in (2.1), show that R is a valuation ring with maximal ideal Rp if and
            only if R (p) = R. Then show that Rp is the unique maximal ideal in R. Show that the
            following is a filtration by subgroups of the multiplicative group k :
                                                           ∗
                                                          n
                                             2
                       ∗
                            ∗
                      k ⊃ R ⊃ 1 + Rp ⊃ 1 + Rp ⊃ ··· ⊃ 1 + Rp ⊃ ··· .
                                                      ∗
                                                         ∗
            In this case show that ord p induces an isomorphism ord p : k /R → Z, reduction mod p
                                                                n
                               ∗
                                              ∗
                                                       ∗
            induces an isomorphism R /(1 + Rp) → k(p) = (R/Rp) , and 1 + ap  → a induces
                              n
            an isomorphism (1 + Rp )/(1 + Rp n+1 ) → k(p) = R/Rp as additive groups.
         3. Let ¯ E(k) ns denote the subgroup of nonsingular points of ¯ E(k). Show that E (0) (k) =
            −1
            r p ( ¯ E(k) ns ) is a subgroup of E(k) with zero equal to 0 : 0 : 1. Show that the restriction
            r p : E (0) (k) → ¯ E(k(p)) ns is a group homomorphism.
        §5. Torsion in Elliptic Curves over Q: Nagell–Lutz Theorem
        Let Tors(A) or A tors denote the torsion subgroup of an abelian group A. In this sec-
        tion we will see that E(Q) tors is a group that can be determined effectively from the
        equation of the curve E, and is in particular a finite group.
        (5.1) Theorem (Nagell–Lutz). Let E be an elliptic curve over the rational numbers
        Q.
         (1) The subgroupE(Q) tors ∩ E (1) (Q) is zero for each odd prime p and

                                    E(Q) tors ∩ E (2) (Q)

            is zero for p = 2.
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143