Page 549 - Encyclopedia of Business and Finance
P. 549

eobf_M  7/5/06  3:15 PM  Page 526


             Motivation


             EXPECTANCY THEORY                                 • Leave the job: Individuals might do this rather than
             Victor Vroom (1932– ) developed the expectancy theory,  experience what they perceive to be continued
             which suggests expectancy is the perceived probability  inequity
             that a certain effort or performance will result in the  When administering compensation and incentive
             achievement of a particular goal. Perceived probability is  programs, managers must be careful to ensure that the
             important. Individuals’ expectations about their ability to
                                                              rewards are equitable; if programs are not perceived as
             accomplish something will affect their success in accom-  equitable, then they will not contribute to employee moti-
             plishing it.                                     vation.
                The desirability of outcomes is important, too. The
             value of or preference for a particular outcome is called  REINFORCEMENT THEORY
             valence. To determine valence, people will ask themselves
                                                              Reinforcement theory is based on the relationship
             whether or not they can accomplish a goal, how impor-
                                                              between behavior and its consequences. In the workplace,
             tant is the goal to them (in the immediate as well as the  reinforcement can be applied to change or modify on-the-
             long term), and what course of action will provide the  job behavior through incentives and rewards and, to some
             greatest reward. An individual’s expectation of actually  extent, punishments.
             achieving the outcome is crucial to success, and many fac-
                                                                 B. F. Skinner (1904–1990), a professor at Harvard
             tors influence this.                             University, was a highly controversial behavioral psychol-
                The expectancy theory can be applied through incen-  ogist known for his work in operant conditioning and
             tive systems that identify desired outcomes and give all  behavior modification. His reinforcement theory takes
             workers the same opportunities to achieve rewards, such  into consideration both motivation and the environment,
             as stock ownership, promotions, or other recognition for  focusing on stimulus and response relationships. Through
             achievement.                                     his research, Skinner noted that a stimulus will initiate
                                                              behavior; thus, the stimulus is an antecedent to behavior.
                                                              The behavior will generate a result; therefore, results are
             EQUITY THEORY
                                                              consequences of behavior.
             The equity theory focuses on individuals’ perceptions of
                                                                 According to Thomas McCoy:
             how fairly they are treated in comparison to others. It was
             developed by J. Stacy Adams (1925– ), who found that  The quality of the results will be directly related to
             equity exists when people consider their compensation  the quality and timeliness of the antecedent. The
             equal to the compensation of others who perform similar  more specific the antecedent is and the closer in
                                                                 time it is to the behavior, the greater will be its
             work, which is an external standard. People judge equity
                                                                 effect on the behavior. . . . The consequences pro-
             by comparing inputs (such as education, experience,
                                                                 vide feedback to the individual. (1992, p. 34)
             effort, and ability) to outputs (such as pay, recognition,
             benefits, and promotion). It can also relate to internal  Therefore, the individual more easily associates the
             standards when people compare how hard they are work-  behavior with the stimulus.
             ing with what they are getting in return.           The four types of reinforcement are:
                If people perceive a discrepancy between the inputs
                                                               1. Positive reinforcement: The application of a pleasant
             and outputs, then they are unhappy. When the ratio is out  and rewarding consequence following a desired
             of balance, inequity occurs. And inequitable pay can cre-  behavior, such as giving praise. When a behavior is
             ate an impossible situation when implementing salary and
                                                                 positively reinforced, the individual is more likely to
             incentive systems. According to Richard L. Daft (2003),
                                                                 repeat the behavior. People tend to have an intrinsic
             individuals will work to reduce perceived inequity by
                                                                 (internal) need for positive reinforcement. Other
             doing the following:
                                                                 examples of positive reinforcers are recognition of
                                                                 accomplishments, promotion, and salary increases.
              • Change inputs: Examples include increasing or
                reducing effort                                2. Negative reinforcement: The removal of an unpleas-
                                                                 ant consequence following a desired behavior. This
              • Change outcomes: Such as requesting a salary increase
                                                                 reinforcement is also called avoidance. An example
                or improved working conditions
                                                                 of negative reinforcement is when workers return
              • Distort perceptions: This occurs when individuals  promptly from a lunch break to avoid being repri-
                cannot change their inputs or outcomes; one exam-  manded by their supervisor or when a manager no
                ple is artificially increasing the importance of awards  longer reminds workers about a weekly deadline


             526                                 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE, SECOND EDITION
   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554