Page 56 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd BioTechnology
P. 56

P1: GRB Revised Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN002J-63  May 18, 2001  14:16







              Biomineralization and Biomimetic Materials                                                  197

              epoxies are solidified by chemical reaction and there is  volume as a soluble polymer assembles into fibers or as a
              some exotic reactive processing of ceramics. Generally,  mineral precipitates will lead to highly porous structures
              chemistry has the problem that small changes in starting  unless the deposition rate is extremely slow. Any structure
              conditions or purity can cause big changes in the reaction  forming in a diffusion field will tend to grow towards the
              kinetics, so reliability is poor.                 source rather than filling in gaps in a layer. Very slow
                In biology, all processing is essentially chemical. Solu-  growth will allow equilibration, which will favor dense
              ble reagents are fed to a site where they combine to make  structures. One solution to this is to lay down a mesh of
              a solid plus dissolved by-products. In the case of epoxies,  strong fibers, fill in the pores with a softer matrix, and
              mentioned above, there is little volume change between  then arrange for this to slowly expel water and harden
              the liquid and solid states. In forming solids from solu-  chemically. This kind of process is seen in wood and in
              tion, there is also a massive shrinkage to be accommo-  cuticle and very similar issues occur in the formation of
              dated. The biological equivalent of molding can be seen  carbon–carbon composites. For such reasons, biological
              in the formation of isolated particles within an envelope of  materials must be composites.
              lipid membrane. Examples include the formation of silica
              in sponge spicules and diatoms and calcite in coccolith  VI. THE PROCESS OF BIOMINERALIZATION
              skeletons. The wall of the “mold” is now permeable to al-
              low reagents in and soluble products out. This approach is  It has long been recognized that most biological tissues
              suitable for isolated particles, such as the magnetic parti-  mineralize by precipitation in an existing organic matrix
              cles in magnetotactic bacteria and for the wall of a single-  that controls crystal form, size, and orientation. Originally,
              celled diatom. The particles may also be later assembled  it was thought that the key step would be nucleation on a
              into a simple framework, as in the sponges. However, this  protein where a suitable spacing of charged groups would
              method does not lend itself to strong, dense, load-bearing  match the crystal lattice to be formed. This picture was
              structures suitable for large plants and animals.  supported by the observation that acidic proteins extracted
                A problem with building a large solid object by chem-  frommolluskshellwouldinhibitcrystalgrowthofcalcium
              ical precipitation is to avoid surrounding and entombing  carbonate from a protein solution but would nucleate crys-
              the cellular machinery for providing the reagents and re-  tal growth if the protein were immobilized on a surface.
              moving the products. The obvious solution is to build the  Since then the picture has become much more compli-
              solid layer-by-layer, such that a layer of cells provides ma-  cated. Studies on nucleation at Langmuir monolayers and
              terial to add to the surface of the growing solid and retreat  on self-assembled monolayers have shown that surface
              ahead of it. The layer approach is apparent in the growth  ionic charge is important but there is no strong evidence
              rings of trees. Bone, tooth, and shell form in the same way.  for lattice matching. While the nucleation effect can be
              In wood and skin, it is the cells themselves that become the  important in growing surface-attached mineral films, it
              structural unit by depositing solid cellulose or keratin in  seems to work only in a window of concentration just
              or on the cell. Each new layer starts as a new layer of cells.  below that at which nucleation occurs readily in solution.
                In bone and tooth, the deposition is external to the cells.  This window can sometimes be widened by adding growth
              In the case of bone growth, the cell layer continuously  inhibitor to the solution. The films that form often seem to
              forms new collagenous matrix material. This then miner-  be limited in thickness, contrary to the reasonable expec-
              alizes and converts to hard bone as new matrix is deposited  tation that growth would readily continue once a mineral
              over it. The control system thus promotes crystal growth  layer had covered the substrate. In the case of molluscan
              in layers several microns from the cell surface while not  nacre it has been shown that some species, at least, nucle-
              mineralizing the freshly formed matrix. Many proteins are  ate each new layer of aragonite by growing through holes
              known to be associated with this process control but it is  in a protein layer, rather than via a nucleating protein as
              not yet clear how they work together.             had been thought.
                One natural consequence of this layerwise growth pro-  Studies of protein synthesis during biological miner-
              cess is that layers of different material can readily be  alization have shown that large numbers of proteins are
              formed within a single solid. As will be seen below, bi-  being produced during the growth of tooth or bone. This
              ology makes extensive use of layered structures to add  gives us the problem of too much information, as it is not
              toughness to strong materials. Recent developments in ce-  at all clear why so many are needed and what they all
              ramics have also focused on the use of layered structures  do. It is clear that much of the control is via inhibition of
              to add toughness. New methods of freeform fabrication  growth on specific crystal faces, leading to control of crys-
              should ultimately allow the production of complex lay-  tal shape and orientation. At first it might seem strange that
              ered structures resembling those of biological materials.  a protein can bind so specifically to one crystal face, but
                A result of chemical precipitation is that it is relatively  a difference in binding strength may be all that is needed
              difficult to make dense structures. The large change in  to change the relative growth rates of two crystal faces
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61