Page 214 - Energy from Toxic Organic Waste for Heat and Power Generation
P. 214

192   Energy from Toxic Organic Waste for Heat and Power Generation


             smoke, 10%–21% decreased HC, 9%–16% decreased CO, and 14%–
             23% decreased NO x  levels have been observed compared to HOME-
             producer gas (HCC) operation.
          •  In a producer gas fueled dual fuel engine, when optimum fuel oil frac-
             tion is used in the HOME, cylinder pressure and heat release rates were
             increased due to the improved fuel properties and mixing rates caused
             by the marginal increase in ignition delay. Fuel oil fraction has higher
             heating value and volatility than HOME. Thus, performance of dual fuel
             engine was slightly increased because of rapid combustion of fuel blend
             along with producer gas.
          •  As for as combustion  characteristics  are concerned, HOME+FO20-
             producer gas operation resulted in decreased ignition delay and com-
             bustion duration and increased cylinder  pressure and improved heat
             release rates were observed compared to HOME-producer gas (HCC)
             operation.
          •  Future developments will concern about the selection of good bio-
             mass and gasifier-engine operating parameters which still need to be
             addressed.
             On the whole, it is concluded that operating the HOME-producer gas
          (RCC)  fueled diesel  engine with  addition of fuel  oil requires adequate
          modifications in the existing diesel engine. Use of fuel oil in such a dual fuel
          engine resulted in overall better engine performance with reduced emission
          levels. It is a challenge to optimize the blend ratio and bowl geometry with
          experimental approach.

          REFERENCES

            [1]  http://envfor.nic.in/soer/2001/ind_air.pdf.
            [2]  Shahriar  S, Erkan  T. When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? Energy Policy
              2009;37:181–9.
            [3]  Tsai WT, Chou YH. An overview of renewable energy utilization from municipal solid
              waste (MSW) incineration in Taiwan. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2006;10:491–502.
            [4]  Kiker C, Bauman E. Producer gas fueled irrigation: evaluating the potential of a tech-
              nology. South J Agric Econ 1984;127–34.
            [5]  Khan  MZH, Sultana  M, Al-Mamun  MR, Hasan  MR. Pyrolytic waste plastic oil
              and its diesel blend: fuel characterization. J Environ Public Health 2016;https://doi.
              org/10.1155/2016/7869080.
            [6]  Mochamad  S, Saptoadi  H, Norsujianto  T, Noviasri  P,  Alimuddin  Z, Cheng  S,
              Yoshikawa K. Fuel oil production from municipal plastic wastes in sequential pyrolysis
              and catalytic reforming reactors. Energy Procedia 2014;47:180–8.
            [7]  Maharana T, Negi YS, Mohanty B. Review article: recycling of polystyrene. Polym-
              Plast Technol Eng 2007;46(7):729–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602550701273963.
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219