Page 302 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 302

EOR mechanisms of wettability alteration and its comparison with IFT  275


                                                 r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                                                   2s wo cosq os
                                                            t o;SI
                          V o;SI                       r
               d o;SI ¼           ¼                  s ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                                    r ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
                      V o;SI þ V o;FI
                                      2s wo cosq os            2s wo cosq os
                                               t o;SI þ  DF o þ          t o;FI
                                          r                        r
                                1
                    ¼     s ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi:

                                 DF o t o;FI
                      1 þ     1 þ
                                  p co  t o;SI
                                                                         (9.61)
                 In the above equations, p cw and p co are the water-oil capillary pressure,
              when respective water or oil imbibes; F w and F o are applied water and
              oil potentials, respectively.
                 For the Amott-Harvey method, the wettability is determined by the
              difference of d w,SI and d w,SI .
                 In shale and tight cores, the spontaneous imbibition times and forced
              imbibition times are very long. It is not practical to use the Amott-Harvey
              method.
                 Recently, Siddiqui et al. (2018) raised three critical questions about
              wettability:
              1. Which contact angle measurements represent in-situ reservoir
                wettability, air/water/rock, air/oil/rock, or oil/water/rock?
              2. If oil/water/rock contact angle measurements represent actual reservoir
                wettability, can it really be reliable if it does not behave similarly in
                imbibition tests?
              3. The electrostatic and chemical forces can significantly contribute to
                water and oil imbibition volumes in shales, and they are also very
                active in controlling contact angles on the rock surface. Why does the
                imbibition volume measurement lead to different wettability than that
                reached by contact angle measurements?
                 The above question 1 is answered by Conclusions 1 and 2 earlier in this
              chapter. Put it simply, the wettability cannot be determined by contact
              angles in a gas-liquid-solid system, and it must be determined in a liquid-
              liquid-solid system.
                 The above question 2 is answered by Conclusion 3: the water and oil
              volumes by spontaneous imbibition in two same dry cores cannot be used
              to determine the wettability.
   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307