Page 304 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 304

EOR mechanisms of wettability alteration and its comparison with IFT  277


              conducted to ensure that these values do not change the conclusions
              regarding the wettability for each of shale samples.
                 This table shows that both water and oil contact angles were less than 90
              (except two water angles) and the oil contact angles were smaller (zero in most
              of the cases) than the water contact angles. By the conventional intuition or
              misconception, those shale rocks are believed to be oil-wet. However, as the

              table shows, the estimated water wetting angles are less than 90 ,indicating
              water-wetness. It seems that more shale samples are water-wet. The author
              of this book also observed that when the IFT is low, the liquid drop is gradually
              collapsing into the rock or at least the drop is becoming smaller and smaller.
              When this observation is made, one may believe the shale samples are oil-
              wet; They may not, actually!
                 The conversion of wetting angle enables some paradoxical data about
              wettability. For example, Lan et al. (2015b) observed stronger oil uptake
              than water update by their tight siltstone rock samples, indicating strong

              oil-wet, but the water contact angle was greater than 37 (supposed to be

              higher than 90 if oil-wet). They believed that this phenomenon was caused
              by oil sorption onto the organic materials (primarily solid bitumen). Howev-
              er, as indicated by the estimated results in the above table, the sample might be
              water-wet. Liang et al. (2016) observed the similar behavior for shale samples
              from the Lower Longmaxi formation in China, but the water wetting angles

              were 12e37 at elevated and normal temperatures; but the estimated results
              in the above table indicate that the sample might be water-wet.


                   9.10 More on wettability of shale and tight
                   formations

                   Overall, the wettability of shale rocks is mixed (possibly oil-wet and
              water-wet), similar to conventional sandstone rocks. It may not be dominantly
              oil-wet as one believes. Adsorption of asphaltenic components controls the
              wettability in conventional reservoirs (Kumar et al., 2008). Shale wettability
              depends on the total organic carbon (TOC) (Odusina et al., 2011). The mixed
              wettability results from the fact that different rock types have different wetta-
              bilities, as inorganic shale rocks are more likely water-wet, whereas the organic
              parts are more likely oil-wet.
                 From the measurements of contact angle and zeta potential, Wolfcamp
              cores and Eagle Ford cores demonstrated intermediate wet to oil-wet
   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309