Page 356 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 356

Forced imbibition                                            329


              Table 11.9 Effect of pressure gradient by changing fracture permeability and
              injected water viscosity.
                                            Surfactant             Alkali
                                      (dp/dl) f ,            (dp/dl) f ,
              Fracture permeability, mD  psi/ft  RF, fraction  psi/ft  RF, fraction
              2000                    0.132      0.0132      0.214   0.0300
              20                      13.209     0.0135      21.683  0.0263
              2                       134.281    0.0178      215.826  0.0284
              Injected water viscosity, cP  dp/dl, psi/ft  RF, fraction
              1                       0.132      0.0132
              10                      1.274      0.0143
              100                     12.681     0.0105



              effect, the fracture permeability is reduced in shale models with surfactant
              and alkaline flooding. Table 11.9 shows that as the fracture permeability is
              reduced to 2 mD, the pressure gradient is increased to 134.281 psi/ft in
              surfactant flooding. Such pressure gradient is too high in actual flooding
              cases in reservoirs. Even so, the oil recovery factors by 9 days of flooding
              are increased from 0.0132 to 0.0178 only, with the absolute recovery being
              practically insignificant. A similar observation can be made for the alkaline
              flooding from this table. Parra et al. (2016) proposed to increase microemul-
              sion viscosity to increase the transverse pressure gradient from fracture to
              matrix for improved oil recovery in fractured reservoirs. This idea is tested
              in the shale models here. In the base case, the injected water viscosity is
              1 cP. The viscosity is increased to 10 and 100 cP so that the pressure gradient
              is increased to 1.274 and 12.681, respectively. However, the absolute oil
              recovery factors shown in Table 11.9 are practically insignificant.
                 Parra et al. (2016) experimentally demonstrated that when the microe-
              mulsion viscosity was increased, the resulting higher pressure gradient
              improved oil recovery. In their experiments, the matrix permeability was
              100e320 mD. Now we use our simulation models to verify their observa-
              tion. By doing so, we can also verify whether our simulation models can
              predict actual performance in chemical flooding. The base shale model is
              used to change the matrix permeability to 100 mD, and increase the water
              viscosity from 1 cP in the base model to 10 cP. The results are presented in
              Table 11.10. When the water viscosity is increased from 1 to 10 cP, the
              resulting pressure gradient is increased from 0.145 to 0.675 psi/ft, and the
              oil recovery factor is increased from 0.766 to 0.999. The incremental oil
   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361