Page 122 - Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West 411 - 533
P. 122

Envoys and Political Communication,411–533

         Avitus’ position is insufficiently consolidated to give too much attention
         to the break from the past. Here and elsewhere, Sidonius is nervous about
         perceptions of Avitus’ legitimacy.
           Established in the opening lines as the central issue, the Vandal theme
         is latent until the penultimate scene of the poem. The account of Avitus’
         duties as magister utriusque militiae under Petronius Maximus and his trip
         to the Goths in Toulouse is interrupted by the only explicit reference
         to the Vandal attack on Rome. 51  It is placed here in the narrative to
         show the alleged significance of this event in relations between Avitus
         and Theoderic II. News of the attack and Petronius Maximus’ death
         dictates the Goths’ response to Avitus’ overtures for peace. Knowing
         that the imperial throne is vacant, Theoderic agrees to peace on con-
         dition that Avitus becomes emperor. Only Avitus’ elevation will ensure
         that the empire has the support of the Goths, specifically against the
         Vandals. This is emphasised by the somewhat clumsy contrast between
                                                    52
         the Gothic sack of Rome in 410 and recentevents. Jupiter’s final speech
         reiterates this theme: the imperial acclamations of Gaul bring fear to the
         Vandals. 53
           These themes reflect Avitus’ approach to the Senate. As emperor,
         Avitus can offer the alliance and support of the Goths, with whose aid the
         West has the opportunity to defeat the Vandals. No other consideration
         of legitimacy should count, and no other candidate for the throne can
         offer this military strength.
           The plotof the Panegyric is a carefully crafted vehicle for these themes of
         renewal and deliverance. Like the speeches and the mythological frame-
         work, the plot is a literary contrivance; it ought not be confused with
         historical developments, however much the contrivance draws upon real-
         ity. The dramatic sequence does not reflect true historical development.
         Sidonius’ style permits him to manipulate historical events freely. The
         mythological frame removes the narrative from reality, and this abstrac-
         tion also affects the account of Avitus’ gesta. Events happen sequentially
         but timelessly. Temporal indicators introducing each episode obscure the
                                          54
         passage of time between actual events. The years between 439 and 451
         pass without notice, and Avitus, addressing the Goths in 455, refers to his
         office as praetorian prefect in 439 as if itrecently preceded his current
         military appointment. 55  The epic tone of the poem enables Sidonius to
         shape characters and events into a historical fiction. Details are provided

         51
           Sid. Ap., Carm. vii, 441–51.
         52                                         53
           Condition: Sid. Ap., Carm. vii, 499–509; sack of 410: 504–6.  Sid. Ap., Carm. vii, 585–91.
         54
           Sid. Ap., Carm. vii, 230: interea; 243: vix; 316 and 319: iam . . . subito; 357: iam;cf. 295: haec post
           gesta.
         55
           Sid. Ap., Carm. vii, 464–7.
                                       96
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127