Page 281 - Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West 411 - 533
P. 281

Negotium agendum

         envoys themselves, or an equivalent of the modern refusal of diplomatic
         recognition; this was a reaction recorded particularly for representatives of
         usurpers. 158  The ramifications of insulting an envoy were pertly exploited
         by Gregory of Tours when King Guntram was proving particularly in-
         tractable on a domestic issue. Gregory reports: ‘ “Listen, O King! I have
         been sentby my lord on an embassy to you. And whatwill I answer him
         who sent me, when you refuse to give me a response?” Stupefied, [the
         king] said, “And who is your lord who sentyou?” Smiling, I said to him,
         “The holy Martin sent me.” ’ Guntram acceded to Gregory’s petition. 159
           On the other hand, ritual also displayed to visiting envoys the scale
         of resources and strength of the host’s forces. Cassiodorus’ formulae stress
         that the ostentation of meals and convivia, and of palace architecture, were
         vehicles for important political messages. 160  Similarly, hosts ensured that
         envoys witnessed public ceremonies other than those put on specifically
         for their benefit. The patricius Symmachus, sent by the eastern imperial
         court to Italy during the consulate of Theoderic’s nominated succes-
         sor Eutharic in 519, was ‘amazed at the riches given to the Goths and
         the Romans’ during the consular celebrations. 161  Military parades were


           of their mission before reaching Attila’s court; Fr. Class. Hist., 249, 251); Gregory of Tours, Hist.
           ix, 20 (Guntram’s warmer reception of envoys from Fredegund than of Childebert II is noted by
           the latter’s legate); Menander Protector, Fr., 9.3 (the emperor Justin II throws the Persian envoy
           Mebodes into confusion by his cold reception, in direct contrast to that given to his predecessor,
           Isdigousnas).
         158  Priscus, Fr., 23.3, 41.2 (Fr. Class. Hist., 317, 347); Procopius, Wars vii, 37.6–7; Gregory of Tours,
           Hist. ix, 1, 16 (the Frankish king Guntram refuses to receive envoys from the Gothic king Rec-
           cared, but sends messengers to them to learn their mission). Withdrawal of recognition: Malalas,
           Chron. xviii, 57 (Gothic king Athalaric refuses to receive Gelimer’s embassies, on Justinian’s
           instructions); usurpers: below, n. 182.
         159  Gregory of Tours, viii, 6: ‘Audiat,o rex,potestas tua. Ecce! a domino meo in legatione ad te directus
           sum. Vel quid renuntiabo ei qui me misit,cum nihil mihi responsi reddere vellis?’ At ille obstupefactus ait:
           ‘Et quis est dominus tuus qui te misit?’ Cui ego subridens: ‘Beatus Martinus’,inquio,‘misit me.’
         160  Convivia: Cass., Variae vi, 3.6, 6.4, 9.7–8; vii, 5.1, 33; architecture: vii, 5.1; cf. Priscus, Fr., 11.1
           (Fr. Class. Hist., 245). Gregory of Tours, Hist. ix, 20 gives a characteristic perspective on the
           effectof a royal convivium on himself as an envoy: ‘he invited us to his dinner, which was not
           more weighed down with dishes than lavish with gaiety’ (convivio nos adscivit,quod fuit non minus
           oneratum in fercolis quam laetitia opulentum); cf. Sid. Ap., Ep. i, 2.6.
             Priscus, Fr., 13.1 [8] shows an alternative exploitation of conventions of display: at a lavish
           dinner for leading nobles as well as envoys from Constantinople, Attila ostentatiously eats simple
           food with wooden plates and cups, and eschews the ornamentation of clothes and weapons
           which mark other Hunnic leaders’ claims to status; the Roman envoys are suitably impressed.
           Similar acts of signal restraint appear as exempla of humility in hagiography, e.g. Sulpicius, Dialogi
           ii, 6; Constantius, Vita Germani, 35.
         161
           Cass., Chron., 1364: stupente etiam Symmacho Orientis legato divitias Gothis Romanisque donatas.Cf.
           Zacharias Rhetor, Historia ecclesiastica ix, 17, cited by Lee and Shepard, ‘Peri Presbeon’, 35 (Persian
           envoys witness Belisarius’ triumph parade in Constantinople after the defeat of the Vandals). For
           a later period: McCormick, ‘Analyzing Imperial Ceremonies’, 9 n. 25. AtProcopius, Wars vi,
           29.7–15, 22, 30, Belisarius addresses his army in the presence of two senatorial envoys from
           Justinian, in order to preclude any suspicion of secret dealing with the Goths on his part.
                                      255
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286