Page 284 - Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West 411 - 533
P. 284

Envoys and Political Communication,411–533

         a truce, declined the king’s offer of gifts. Not money and valuables, said
         Severus, but the handing-over of Roman captives, was an appropriate gift
         for an envoy; Geiseric, impressed by his personal integrity, concurred. 172
         The cultivation of ties through gift-exchange, however, was not restricted
         to the long-distance exchange of monarchs and generals and their rep-
         resentatives. Private petitioners to provincial authorities took gifts to lu-
         bricate their demands. 173  Somewhatmore surprisingly, emperors, kings,
         and senior magistrates are attested giving gifts to provincial envoys. 174
           The ceremonial of an imperial or royal audience demanded ritual
         clothing. At the imperial court of Constantinople, envoys from the
         West changed into dark-coloured chlamyses before entering the imperial
         presence. 175  Clothing projected multiple symbolic messages in different
         contexts. In the tableau of authority which a formal reception entailed,
         the ritual symbolism of power overrode even religious ideology. Lupici-
         nus, abbot of a monastery in Burgundian Gaul, imitated St Martin in his
         extreme poverty of clothing,aninversionofsocialconventionsintendedto
         make a bold statement of humility. Yet, when undertaking intercessions
         atthe courtof the Burgundian kings, even Lupicinus putshoes on. 176
           No late antique source attests any distinctive emblem marking envoys,
         with one exception. In a scene set in 585, Gregory of Tours describes
         two legati dispatched from the Merovingian royal usurper Gundovald to
         king Guntram, ‘with staffs [virgae] consecrated according to the manner
         of the Franks, so that they should not be interfered with by anyone, but
         should return after their embassy with the king’s response’. This is one
         of the very few apparently Frankish customs Gregory describes, but its
         mention is not incidental. Gregory’s unique reference to this token of
         inviolability bodes ill for the envoys, for only a few lines later they are
         put in chains, set on the rack, beaten, interrogated under torture, and
         thrown into prison, a characteristically Gregorian punch-line. 177

         172  Malchus, Fr., 5 (Fr. Class. Hist., 411); see above, chapter 4,n. 191.
         173
           E.g. Sid. Ap., Ep. iv, 8.5.
         174
           Sulpicius, Dial. ii, 5 (the emperor Valentinian I to Martin); Constantius, Vita Germani, 24
           (praetorian prefect of Gaul Auxiliaris to Germanus); Vita Viviani, 6 (Theoderic I of Toulouse to
           Vivianus); Ennodius, Vita Epiphani, 188 (general reference to the many gifts Theoderic bestows
           on envoys).
         175
           De cer. i, 87.
         176
           Vies des P` eres du Jura [Vita Lupicini], ed. Martine, 63. On clothing symbolism in saints’ Vitae:
           Lynda L. Coon, Sacred Fictions: Holy Women and Hagiography in Late Antiquity (Philadelphia,
           1997), 52–70.
         177
           Gregory of Tours, Hist. vii, 32–3: cum virgis consecratis iuxta ritum Francorum ut scilicet non continger-
           entur ab ullo,sed exposita legatione cum responsu reverterentur (the names of the envoys, Zotanus and
           Zahulfus, are interpolated in only one late manuscript; Krusch-Levison, n. ad loc.). W. Goffart,
           ‘Foreigners in the Histories of Gregory of Tours’, in his Rome’s Fall and After (London, 1989),
           275–7; E. James, ‘Gregory of Tours and the Franks’, in Murray (ed.), After Rome’s Fall, 60.
                                      258
   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289