Page 96 - Envoys and Political Communication in the Late Antique West 411 - 533
P. 96

Envoys and Political Communication,411–533

         sensible to give wide berth to the kingdom of the Goths’ client. It is more
         probable that news of the embassy came from contact with the Goths.
         Hydatius records three other entries on Aegidius, each concerning his
         battles with the Goths in Gaul. Of the general’s conflict with Ricimer
         and Severus, or his earlier triumphs over the Franks, Hydatius appears
         unaware. 136  The perspective is that of Toulouse, not of the imperial court
         or of Aegidius himself. So, too, news of the maritime embassy may have
         come from Toulouse. Secrecy was not a major characteristic of ancient
         communications. Aegidius may well have advertised the embassy after its
         return, in order to spread concern among his enemies. During 463 and
         464, there were communications between the Gallaecian provincials, the
         Sueves, and the Goths. 137  News could well have reached Hydatius from
         the courts of Toulouse or Braga.


                                Multiple embassies
         Two entries unique to Hydatius indicate the range of political relations
         simultaneously maintained by western powers. Both describe multiple
         embassies dispatched at times of crisis. In September 454, Valentinian III
         murdered the general Aetius in the imperial palace at Rome. Aetius had
         dominated western politics for almost thirty years, largely through his
         personal relations with the Huns. In 454, while attempting to form a
         dynastic union with the imperial family, he fell victim to a court faction
         which spurred Valentinian against him. 138
           Aetius’ removal had many consequences; Valentinian’s own death six
         months later was one. Of the several sources recording the aftermath
         of Aetius’ death, only Hydatius notes the following: ‘After [murdering
         Aetius and his followers], Valentinian sent envoys to the gentes. Justinian
         was the envoy who went to the Sueves.’ 139  Contact with barbarian groups
         was necessitated by Aetius’ death not because he had been the power
         behind the imperial throne, but because he had for so long been a general
         in the field. The role of the empire’s representative on the frontier, which
         had been that of the emperors until the end of the fourth century, had
         been assumed by the long-serving magister militum. 140  The embassies did
         not prevent strife. Barbarian groups both within and outside imperial
         136
           Hyd., cc. 217 (surrender of Narbonne), 218 (battle of Orl´ eans), 228 (Goths take areas previously
           held by Aegidius after his death) [212, 214, 224]. Cf. Muhlberger, Fifth-Century Chroniclers,
           233–4.
         137
           Table 1 nos. 24–6, 28–9.
         138
           PLRE ii, 28; Stein i, 349; Seeck, Untergang vi, 319–20; B. L. Twyman, ‘Aetius and the Aristoc-
           racy’, Historia 19 (1970), 480–503; O’Flynn, Generalissimos, 95.
         139
           Hyd., c. 161 [153]: His gestis legatos Valentinianus mittit ad gentes,ex quibus ad Suevos venit Iustinianus.
         140
           Cf. Seeck, ‘Flavius Aetius’, RE i.1, 702–3; O’Flynn, Generalissimos, 86–7, 89–90.
                                       70
   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101