Page 70 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 70

55







                                                  fl   work wire









                                                   B
                                              chain

                                seabed
                               anchor              B

       Fig. 7. Schematic representation of anchor handling vessel (AHV) lifting the anchor chain with six strand wire rope
       ‘work wire’. The increasing tension as more chain is lifted causes rotation at the point of connection between rope and
       chain, the turns accumulating in the chain at zero tension on the seabed.




       recovery of the end of the chain for the purpose of attaching the spiral strand. This is achieved by
       hauling the rope pendant onto the anchor handling vessel (AHV) winch.
         The chain is sized for the mooring application, but the rope is a work wire, and for this use has
       to support only the weight of the chain. At the start of this process all the chain is on the seabed
       and the rope is just supporting its own weight. As the rope is wound onto the winch the tension,
       which  is  always  greatest  at the  surface,  gradually  increases  as the  heavy  chain  is raised.  This
       increase in tension causes the rope to untwist since there is no torsional restraint from the slack
       chain on the seabed (see Fig. 7). As the chain is progressively lifted, the untwisted rope is wound
       onto  the  drum  and  the  opposing  twist  transferred  along  the  chain, accumulating in  the  final
       grounded section adjacent to the anchor. Once the end of the chain is on the deck of the AHV, the
       spiral strand is attached from a second AHV and the combination lowered back to the seabed as
       the spiral strand is paid out. The arrangement with the three components and two AHVs prevents
       further rotation. Finally the work wire is disconnected and the spiral strand tensioned. The increase
       in  tension  in  the  chain  transforms  its  torsional  stiffness, causing  the  accumulated  twist  to  be
       transferred to the lower stiffness spiral strand. When the system is again relaxed to await hook up
       to the FPSO, the spiral strand can no longer sustain the imposed twist and forms kinks or hockles.
       When these hockles are pulled  straight for final connection to the FPSO the rope is effectively
       destroyed, deforming as shown in Fig. 8.
         To try to quantify the turns transformed  from the work wire to the chain, the torsion model
       defined by Feyrer and Schiffner [4] has been used with values the authors obtained for a rope of
       appropriate construction but, at 20 mm, of rather smaller diameter. Other quantities for the base
       case are as given below, and relate to the incident referred to by Komura [ 11 in so far as details are
       known.
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75