Page 160 - Fearless Leadership
P. 160

Standing for the Success of Each Other  147


               Leaders were resigned for two reasons: (1) having to deal with a recur-
             ring breakdown, and (2) not having an effective method for correcting the
             situation. Breakdowns and challenges are to be expected. But a predica-
             ment occurs when the resolution of a problem requires a change in behav-
             ior that no process or system can correct.
               In another organization, leaders could not align on a new process for
             connecting customer interactions and product delivery from beginning to
             end. Each group had their own approach and did not want to change their
             system which became particularly apparent with the financial group.
             When the financial group dug their heels in and argued for the status quo
             with only small modifications, everyone became demoralized and frus-
             trated. Not once was the question asked, “How will our process impact our
             customers?” All eyes were focused on what was best for internal groups
             and the customer—the end user—was left completely out of the equation.
               Finally the CEO threw up his hands and said, “We’re keeping the cur-
             rent system for now, and in a couple of years we’ll review what changes
             are needed.” He avoided taking a stand and compromised for fear of upset-
             ting people.
               From these two examples we can see how unresolved breakdowns lead
             to inferior decision making. Why do we have structured and disciplined
             processes for every aspect of business from project management to qual-
             ity control, yet we have nothing for how people work together to achieve
             efficiencies for the business? In the most important area in which we need
             structure and guidelines, we have none. People cannot be held account-
             able for a standard of behavior that can be conveniently manipulated, is
             applied inconsistently, or does not exist. Missing this important point keeps
             us operating backward and paying the price for substandard organizational
             effectiveness.


               When the going gets tough, fearless leaders have compassion for
               people but they hold the line on high behavioral standards.

               We wonder why instability exists and people become resigned. Let’s face
             the problem squarely: it is not because of breakdowns or challenges. People
             are ready for those events. It is because of the enormous amount of energy
             required to deal with those who are not taking accountability, are not
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165