Page 57 - Fiber Bragg Gratings
P. 57

38         Chapter 2 Photosensitivity and Photosensitization of Optical Fibers

        However, the picture is not as simple, since another mechanism opposes
        it: the relief of the internal stress frozen in during fiber fabrication, on
        UV exposure [96,97]. Stress relief can only remove the effect of the frozen-
        in stress and is therefore strongly dependent on the initial thermoelastic
        stress at fabrication. There is correlation between fiber drawing tension
        and the maximum induced index change for Type I gratings but reduced
        maximum index change for Type IIA [98]. The process of densification
        has been shown to occur in fibers as evidenced by scans using an atomic
        force microscope of the surface of D-shaped fibers and in etched fibers
        [99], and in preform samples that were drawn into a D-shaped fiber
        [100]. These observations are on the surface of the sample and are unable
        to replicate the stress profiles within the core of the fiber directly. Direct
        optical measurement of in-fiber stress has indicated that rather than the
        relief of the stress, tensile stress actually increases with an associated re-
        duction in the average refractive index by —30% of the observed UV induced
        refractive index change in non-hydrogen loaded, high-germania-content fi-
        bers [101]. The changes in the stress profile of the fiber are consistent with
        the shift in the Bragg wavelength of a grating during inscription [102].
            The third mechanism for the UV induction of the refractive index
        change is via the formation of Ge-H and the generation of GeE' centers;
        it was proposed by Tsai and Friebele [89]. The concentration of the GeE'
        have been previously correlated with the presence of the precursor states
        of the Ge(I) and Ge(II) centers. However, the concentration of GeE' centers
        continues to grow despite the saturation of both Ge(I) and Ge(II), indicat-
        ing that the formation of the E' centers has another route. The color
        center model for the changes in the refractive index is supported by the
        measurements made by Atkins et al. [103],


        2.7 Summary of routes to
                photosentization

        A method for photosensitizing silica optical fiber is based on the observa-
        tion that increasing the 240-nm absorption enhances the effect [104].
        Thus, reduced germania present as GeO has been shown to have a good
        photosensitive response. Other defect formers, such as europium [80],
        cerium [81], and thulium [43], also fall in this category, albeit with a
        smaller effect. Phosphorus, which is used extensively in the fabrication
        of germania-doped silica planar waveguides, shows a weak response with
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62