Page 161 - Flexible Robotics in Medicine
P. 161

Modular origami joint operator to create bendable motions with multiple radii 147

               tracheostomy procedure, a set of criteria is constructed based on the results of
               benchmarking and other regulatory issues involved.

               Since tracheostomy is an invasive procedure, considerations to its safety level must be
               highly regarded to prevent the immune response from the user after MOJO has been
               inserted into the body. As such, the materials used for MOJO must be biocompatible,
               nontoxic, nonbiodegradable, and wear resistant. Besides biocompatibility issues, we should
               also consider other factors affecting the safety level of the MOJO device. For instance,
               MOJO devices, including the drilling wire, hinges, and tendons, must be able to withstand
               high tensile force without breakage. In the case of breakage, it can cause part of the device
               to be trapped in the subject’s body, compromising the safety and comfort level of the user.
               Hence there is a need for careful material selection to ensure safety.


               Acknowledgment

               This work was in part supported by the National Key Research and Development Program, The Ministry of
               Science and Technology (MOST) of China (No. 2018YFB1307703).


               References

                [1] C.G. Durbin, Indications for and timing of tracheostomy, Respir. Care 50 (4) (2005) 483 487. Retrieved
                    from ,http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/50/4/483..
                [2] C.G. Durbin, Techniques for performing tracheostomy, Respir. Care 50 (4) (2005) 488 496. Retrieved
                    from ,http://rc.rcjournal.com/content/50/4/488..
                [3] B. Batuwitage, S. Webber, A. Glossop, Percutaneous tracheostomy, Continuing Educ. Anaesth. Crit. Care
                    Pain. 14 (6) (2014) 268 272. ,https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkt068..
                [4] I. Susanto, Comparing percutaneous tracheostomy with open surgical tracheostomy, BMJ 324 (7328)
                    (2002) 3 4.
                [5] L.D. Grey, T. Price, J. Patel, B. Matta, R. Tandon, C. Russell, et al., in: C. Russell, B.F. Matta (Eds.),
                    Tracheostomy: A Multi-Professional Handbook, Greenwich Medical Media, London, 2004.
                [6] A. Cipriano, M.L. Mao, H.H. Hon, D. Vazquez, S.P. Stawicki, R.P. Sharpe, et al., An overview of
                    complications associated with open and percutaneous tracheostomy procedures, Int. J. Crit. Illn. Injury
                    Sci. 5 (3) (2015) 179 188.
                [7] M. Rudas, I. Seppelt, R. Herkes, R. Hislop, D. Rajbhandari, L. Weisbrodt, Traditional landmark versus
                    ultrasound-guided tracheal puncture during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in adult intensive care
                    subjects: a randomized controlled trial, Crit. Care 18 (5) (2014) 514. Available from: https://doi.org/
                    10.1186/s13054-014-0514-0.
                [8] V.D. Sars, S. Haliyo, J. Szewczyk, A practical approach to the design and control of active endoscopes,
                    Mechatronics 20 (2) (2010) 251 264.
                [9] S. Pattanshetti, S.C. Ryu, Design and fabrication of laser-machined hinge joints on miniature tubes for
                    steerable medical devices, J. Mech. Robot. 10 (1) (2018) 011002.
               [10] J. Catherine, C. Rotinat-Libersa, A. Micaelli, Comparative review of endoscopic devices articulations
                    technologies developed for minimally invasive medical procedures, Appl. Bionics Biomech. 8 (2) (2011)
                    151 171.
               [11] D. Jeong, K. Lee, Design and analysis of an origami-based three-finger manipulator, Robotica 36 (2)
                    (2018) 261 274.
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166