Page 297 - Flexible Robotics in Medicine
P. 297
Flexible robotic platform with multiple-bending tendon-driven mechanism 287
12.5.4 Robust testing for further development
The tests and experiments in this chapter validate on the development of the preliminary
design for the multiple-section tendon-driven robotic surgical platform. More robust testing
needs to be conducted for the further development of such a surgical platform. This could
include a force analysis of the flexible manipulator using force sensors to study the force
control of the flexible manipulator.
12.6 Conclusion
This chapter presents the feasibility of developing a surgical robotic platform that exhibits
multiple-section flexible arms, driven by tendon-driven wires that are attached to driving
motors. The use of a commercial microcontroller board ATmega2560 to control
simultaneous stepper motors movements is useful in manipulating a multiple-section
flexible arm such as the one presented in this preliminary robotic platform. The shape
manipulation test and the cadaveric test indicate that the multiple-section flexible arm
platform can be manipulated to shapes that are difficult for a single-section flexible
platform and has an expanded workspace that allows the multiple-section platform to be
more adaptable in working around complicated workspaces as shown in the cadaveric
experiment conducted.
This preliminary design of a robotic surgical platform hopes to deliver an alternative
approach to robot-assisted surgery, which is less costly due to its simple actuating
mechanism, as well as having a more excellent operating space due to the greater
maneuverability.
Acknowledgment
Adib would like to acknowledge Dr. Li Zheng and Mr. Abdurraheim for the valuable suggestions in the
electronics.
References
[1] F. Corcione, C. Esposito, D. Cuccurullo, A. Settembre, N. Miranda, F. Amato, et al., Advantages and limits
of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience, Surg. Endosc. 19 (1) (2005) 117 119.
[2] B. Morri, Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education, MedGenMed 7 (3)
(2005) 72.
[3] Y. Zhou, H. Ren, M.Q. Meng, Z.T. Tse, H.Y. Yu, Robotics in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic
surgery, J. Mech. Med. Biol. 13 (2013) 1350044.
[4] J.M. Oliveira, Y. Chen, I.W. Hunter, Robotic endoscope motor module and gearing design, in: 2011
Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, IEEE, 2011.
[5] Arduino Mega 2560, Retrieved from Arduino: ,http://www.arduino.cc/en/Main/arduinoBoardMega2560.,
2015.