Page 190 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 190

172               SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW


                      Equations (3.128)  and  (3.129)  may  be  rendered  dimensionless  by  means  of  the
                   following:





                                                                                       (3.130)




                    The  solution  of  the  equations  of  motion  may  be  achieved  by  the  method  of
                    Section 3.3.6(a). Typical results are shown in Figure 3.71(b), in terms of  the parameter
                    2u2/n2  - 1  for various values of B’  and Zr2/Cw = 1.5, for both transverse and torsional
                    motions.  The  full  lines  correspond  to  results  obtained  for  B = 0  and  hence  to  a
                    system without flow  subjected to  a  follower force  9 = u2; however,  since divergence
                    is independent of #?, the stability curve for B = 0 applies equally to cases with flow.
                      It is seen that three types of  instability are possible: (i) torsional divergence for small
                    enough E; (ii) torsional flutter (dashed curves) for intermediate Z;  (iii) transverse flutter
                    (horizontal dashed lines) for high E. Thus, a system with #?’ = 0.2 would lose stability by
                    divergence if a!  = 0.5, by torsional flutter if  a!  = 1.5, and by transverse flutter if E = 2.5.
                    Of course, according to linear theory, in the case of E = 1.5, transverse flutter would arise
                    at higher flow (the horizontal lines for transverse flutter really extend across the figure),
                    and so on.
                      It is of  special interest that torsional divergence is possible, whereas transverse diver-
                    gence is not. Equations (3.128) and (3.129) are similar in structure to those for transverse
                    motion, with the torsional terms (proportional to GJ) playing the role of a conservative
                    tensile load. However, it is known that tension does not induce divergence (Section 3.5.8).
                    Hence, torsional divergence probably arises via  the M U2-related term  in  the boundary
                    conditions (largest at small E) - cf. Chapter 8.
                      Another plate-pipe  system, used for marine propulsion, is discussed in Section 4.7.



                    3.6.7  Concluding remarks
                    The main purpose of  Section 3.6 is  (i) to briefly document all these interesting studies
                    in  one place,  and  (ii) to  show the  veritable cornucopia of  interesting dynamical prob-
                    lems  that  may  be  obtained  with  simple  modifications to  the  basic  system  of  a  pipe
                    conveying  fluid - particularly  the  nonconservative  case  of  a  cantilevered  pipe.  This,
                    despite  the  early  scepticism  on  the  practical  value  in  studying  the  stability  of  such
                    systems, as expressed for instance by Timoshenko & Gere (1961; section 2.21), regarding
                    the critical load for a cantilevered column subjected to a tangential follower load:  ‘No
                    definite conclusion  can  be  made  (as  yet)  regarding  the  practical  value  of  the  result,
                    since no  method  has  been devised for  applying a tangential force to  a  column during
                    bending’. Although a method has now been found, this is not really the important point.
                    What  is  important  in  the  study  of  these  systems will  emerge  from  the  chapters  that
                    follow,  and  what  is  practically  important  from  the  pertinent  sections  on  applications
                    therein.
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195