Page 188 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 188

170                SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW

                    compression  was provided by  an  air jet,  issuing  from  a pair  of  nozzles affixed to  the
                    beam at a slight angle, so as to avoid interaction with it; the compressive reaction force
                    was towards the clamped end. The air was supplied via pairs of light rubber hoses, one
                    vertically above and the other below the blade. Despite the obvious difficulties associated
                    with minimizing the effect of  the supply hoses, excellent qualitative and to some extent
                    quantitative  agreement  with  the  theory  of  Figure 3.70(c)  was  obtained:  for  tS > 0.45
                    divergence was observed, while for tS < 0.45  flutter was observed.
                      In the case of a cantilevered beam with a tangential end-load at the free end, representing
                    Beck’s problem (Section 3.2.2), there is no simple way of  minimizing the effect of fluid
                    supply lines. Nevertheless, a  successful experiment was conducted by  Sugiyama et al.
                    (1990, 1995) by attaching a solid-fuel rocket to the free end! The aluminium cantilever
                    (section: 6 x 30 mm, L = 800- 1400 mm) weighed 0.4-0.7 kg. The motor was much more
                    massive, - 14 kg, and could supply about 390 N force for 4 s. Hence, special techniques
                    had  to be  developed for  deciding whether  a damped  or amplified oscillation occurred
                    from only a few cycles of  oscillation in the period over which the rocket supplied full
                    thrust. Also, not only the mass but the moment of inertia of the motor had to be taken
                    into account. Agreement of  experiment with theory is excellent, provided dissipation is
                    ignored; once taken  into  account, viscoelastic damping in  the  column  (a = 5  x  low4)
                    is found to diminish the theoretical critical thrust by  a  factor of  2  as compared to the
                    undamped system, thus rendering agreement apparently rather poor. However, once the
                    criterion  ‘for stability in a finite time’ (Leipholz 1970) is used, the two sets of  theoret-
                    ical  results  come very  close  to  each  other,  thus  leading to  very  good agreement with
                    experiment.


                    3.6.6  Pipes with attached plates

                    One such system, depicted in Figure 3.71(a), is considered by Herrmann & Nemat-Nasser
                    (1967) as part of a series of studies on the stability of nonconservative mechanical systems.
                    It consists of  a thin plate or I-section, with two pairs of flexible pipes attached to it and
                    conveying fluid. This system can execute both flexural transverse motions and torsional
                    motions  [cf. Nemat-Nasser & Henmann’s  (1966)  work on  the  same  structural system
                    subjected to a follower load], and it is in the study of the latter that lies the main contri-
                    bution of  this work.
                       The equation of  motion of  the  system for flexural transverse motion is  the  same as
                    before, equation (3.1), except that 2M  replaces M, which now is the mass per unit length
                    for eachpair of pipes. For torsional motions, adapting Benjamin’s statement of Hamilton’s
                    principle to suit, Henmann & Nemat-Nasser (1967) obtained the following equation of
                    motion and boundary conditions:

                                +
                                                                +
                                                            a29
                             a49
                        EC,  - [2MU2r2 - GJ]- a29 +MUh2 - (mr2 + iMh2)- a29 = 0;  (3.128)
                             ax4                ax2         axat               at2
                                                                                        (3.129)
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193