Page 312 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 312

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: NONLINEAR AND CHAOTIC DYNAMICS          293

              At first glance these equations seem wrong (as no nonlinear velocity-dependent terms are
              present); however, if further simplification is carried out, equation (5.54) yields the correct
              form of governing equation in  terms of z. The U  and  U2 terms are actually ‘hidden’ in
              the nonlinear inertial term. Indeed, eliminating x through the condition of inextensibility
              leads to
                     (rn + M) Z( 1 - 1”) + 2 M  U i’ + M  U2 z” + EZ (z”” + 3 z’ z”  z’”  +  z”~)

                       +z’~’(rn+M”i’’+z’i’)ds

                                                            L
                       - i” ( lL (rn + M)(i” + z’i’) ds ds - 1 (m + M) Z Z’  ds)  = 0.   (5.55)

              By  multiplying  by  (1 + z’~) throughout,  keeping  cubic  nonlinear terms  and  replacing
              nonlinear inertial terms [cf. Section 5.2.7(b)], one may bring equation (5.55) with z  = w
              into the same form as (5.28).
                Hence, this equation of motion is irreproachable. No nonlinear terms are missing, except
              for the gravity terms, since gravity has been neglected. However, the different steps from
              one equation to  another are not  very  clear in  the original derivation; also, Bajaj et al.
              (1980) use some implicit relationships of the curvature (Semler 1991), and the procedure
              for eliminating nonlinear inertial terms is not fully explained. Hence, verification is not
              easy.
                Finally, similarly to Rousselet & Herrmann, Bajaj et al. also establish an equation for
              the flow, by considering a force balance on a fluid element, yielding


                                                                                  (5.56)

              where  UO is the constant flow velocity when the pipe is not in motion, a!  represents the
              resistance to the  fluid motion  (proportional to  a  friction factor) and  aMUi represents
              the constant pressure force at the fixed end s = 0 of the tube. It is found that a!  plays an
              important role in the dynamics, as discussed in Section 5.7.1.

              (d) Ch ‘ng and Dowell‘s  work

              Ch’ng & Dowell (1979) obtained nonlinear equations of motion of a pipe conveying fluid
              by  the energy method based on Hamilton’s principle. An Eulerian approach is used  to
              describe the  dynamics of  the system, and the flow is assumed to  be  steady. Using first
              only linear relationships, the well-known linear equation is found:

                  EZ z””  + 2 M  U i’ + M  U2 z”  - (M + m)g[(L - x)~’]’ + (m + M) Z  = 0.   (5.57)
                Ch’ng and Dowell then consider the  nonlinear effects due to tension associated with
              the axial elongation of the pipe,

                                                                                  (5.58)

              This  relationship  implies that  the  cantilevered pipe  is  extensible, which  is  an  unusual
              but by  no means erroneous assumption. By assuming the tube to be Hookean, an axial
   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317