Page 286 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 286

PIPES CONVEYING FLUID: LINEAR DYNAMICS I1              267

                    Table 4.6  The  applicability  of  three  possible  decoupling  schemes  for  a
                                    cantilevered pipe with an end-mass.

                    System       U         Method  (a)   Method (b)   Method (c)
                                                        WI = 3.516    ~1  = 3.516
                                                        W? = 22.03    ~2  = 22.03
                                                        UH = 4.485    UH = 4.485
                                                        WH = 11.6     WH = 11.6
                                                        UH = 4.706    UH  = 4.706
                                                        WH = 14.49    WH  = 14.49
                                                        ~1  = 2.36    WI  = 2.36
                                                        W? = 17.60    ~2  = 17.79
                                                        UH  = 4.05    UH  = 4.13
                                                        WH  = 8.0     WH = 7.9






             given in the second case. The values of  u and w  at the Hopf bifurcation are denoted by
             UH  and WH.
               It  is clear from Table 4.6 that, in the absence of time-dependent boundary conditions
             (p = 0), any one of the three methods may be used. Any of the three methods may also
             be  used  provided that  the  system is  nongyroscopic, e.g.  for  p = 0.3 when  /3  = 0; the
             small differences in  the results by  method (c) are due to different rates of  convergence
             (all results here are with N  = 2).  When, however, the system is nonconservative gyro-
             scopic (B # 0) and  has time-dependent boundary  conditions, which  is  the last entry in
             the table, it is clearly seen that method (a) is incorrect. It is for this reason that the ana-
             lysis in Section 5.8.3(a,c) is carried out with method (c), but that in Section 5.8.3(b) with
             method (b). The interested reader is also referred to Chen (1970) and Lin & Chen (1976).
               Before closing this section, it should be mentioned that there now exist powerful general
             computational methods for  solving free, transient and  forced vibrations of  this  type  of
             system, which are presented in Section 4.7.

             4.7  APPLICATIONS
             Virtually all of the research on the dynamics of pipes conveying fluid has been curiosity-
            driven, even though it sometimes was inspired  by practical applications. Some attempts
             have been made to justify the effort by linking it, generally unconvincingly, to applications
             in oil pipelines, heat exchanger tubes, etc.; unconvincingly, because it has been known,
             certainly since the early  1950s, that the effect of  internal flow on the dynamics of  pipes
             conveying fluid  begins to become interesting, let alone worrisome, at flow  vclocities at
             least ten times those found in typical engineering systems. That is the reason why most
            experiments have been done with elastomer rather than metal pipes, thus achieving the
             necessary dimensionless u with modest values of dimensional flow velocity, U.
              Nevertheless, some applications do exist, as will be described in what follows. Most
            of  them  have  emerged  unexpectedly ten,  twenty  or  thirty  years  after  the  basic  work
             was done  (Paldoussis  1993). Some have already been  mentioned, sprinkled throughout
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291