Page 205 - Forensic Structural Engineering Handbook
P. 205

THE ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION PROCESS        6.7

             examination can be limited, investigators representing parties of different interests some-
             times cooperate in the data collection and testing phases of an investigation. In any case, a
             practical approach should be used in investigation and remediation. It is important to work
             with civil authorities to protect the interest of the public who might not otherwise be a party
             to the investigation.



             STEPS IN THE INVESTIGATION

             From the outset, the forensic engineer creates an investigative plan, the common steps of which
             are shown in Table 6.3. However, not all investigations employ all steps, and the investigative
             plan is continuously revised to account for new information and evolving theories.

                   TABLE 6.3 Common Steps in the Investigative Process
                   Commission of forensic engineer by client
                   Definition of objective of investigation
                   Collection of background information
                   Preliminary document review
                   Initial reconnaissance site visit
                   Eyewitness interviews
                   Formulation of investigative plan
                   Formation of project team
                   Comprehensive collection of documents
                   Document review
                   Site investigation
                   Sample collection
                   Theoretical analyses
                   Laboratory analyses
                   Development of failure hypotheses, analysis of data, synthesis of information,
                    and formation of conclusions
                   Determination of procedural responsibilities for failures
                   Report writing


               One must always be alert for a client’s attempt to influence the engineering opinions
             expressed as a result of an investigation. An independent expert engineering opinion should
             be just that. An expert should not be an advocate for a client’s position in litigation.
               The process of investigating failures does not follow standard procedures, since each inves-
             tigation is different and requires a tailored approach. Nevertheless, there are some useful guide-
             lines for conducting investigations. The most noteworthy are found in Refs. 4 through 9.
               Case studies of individual failure investigations as well as articles on particular failure
             issues can be found in the Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, published
             quarterly by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), as well as in other engi-
             neering publications.


             Field Investigations
             Initial field investigations should focus on quickly gaining an understanding of the big pic-
             ture issues involved. Has a collapse occurred? Is additional collapse likely (Fig. 6.5)? If a
             beam has failed at a certain connection, how many similar connections exist throughout the
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210