Page 143 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 143

1656_C003.fm  Page 123  Monday, May 23, 2005  5:42 PM





                       Elastic-Plastic Fracture  Mechanics                                         123


                       Equation (3.48) indicates that d  = 1/m, assuming s = s  (see Footnote 2). According to Figure
                                                                     YS
                                                                 o
                                                n
                       3.18(a), d = 1.0 for a nonhardening material (n = ∞) in plane stress, which agrees with the strip-
                              n
                       yield model (Equation (3.44)).
                          The Shih analysis shows that there is a unique relationship between J and CTOD for a given
                       material. Thus these two quantities are equally valid crack-tip-characterizing parameters for elastic-
                       plastic materials. The fracture toughness of a material can be quantified either by a critical value
                       of J or CTOD.
                          The above analysis contains an apparent inconsistency. Equation (3.48) is based on the HRR
                       singularity, which does not account for large geometry changes at the crack tip. Figure 3.12 indicates
                       that the stresses predicted by the HRR theory are inaccurate for r < 2d, but the Shih analysis uses
                       the HRR solution to evaluate displacements well within the large strain region. Crack-tip finite
                       element analyses [14], however, are in general agreement with Equation (3.48). Thus the displace-
                       ment fields predicted from the HRR theory are reasonably accurate, despite the large plastic strains
                       at the crack tip.

                       3.4 CRACK-GROWTH RESISTANCE CURVES

                       Many materials with high toughness do not fail catastrophically at a particular value of J or CTOD.
                       Rather, these materials display a rising R curve, where J and CTOD increase with crack growth.
                       In metals, a rising R curve is normally associated with the growth and coalescence of microvoids.
                       See Chapter 5 for a discussion of microscopic fracture mechanisms in ductile metals.
                          Figure 3.19 schematically illustrates a typical J resistance curve for a ductile material. In the
                       initial stages of deformation, the R curve is nearly vertical; there is a small amount of apparent
                       crack growth due to blunting. As J increases, the material at the crack tip fails locally and the crack
                       advances further. Because the R curve is rising, the initial crack growth is usually stable, but an
                       instability can be encountered later, as discussed below.
                          One measure of fracture toughness J  is defined near the initiation of stable crack growth. The
                                                       Ic
                       precise point at which crack growth begins is usually ill-defined. Consequently, the definition of
                       J  is somewhat arbitrary, much like a 0.2% offset yield strength. The corresponding CTOD near
                       Ic
                       the initiation of stable crack growth is denoted d  by U.S. and British testing standards. Chapter 7
                                                              i
                       describes experimental measurements of J  and d  in more detail.
                                                               i
                                                         Ic
























                       FIGURE 3.19 Schematic J resistance curve for a ductile material.
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148