Page 204 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 204

1656_C004.fm  Page 184  Thursday, April 21, 2005  5:38 PM





                       184                                   Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications


                       Combining Equation (4.16)–(4.20) with Equation (2.51) gives

                                                                    t
                                                                 K 2 ()
                                                              V
                                                         t
                                                       G() =  A  ( )  I                          (4.21)
                                                                  E′
                       where
                                                             V       −1
                                                   AV() ≈    −  1   ( −  hV)                 (4.22)
                                                                 1
                                                             c      
                                                               r
                       Thus the relationship between  K  and  G depends on crack speed. A more accurate (and more
                                                  I
                       complicated) relationship for A(V ) is given in Appendix 4.1.
                          When the plastic zone ahead of the propagating crack is small, K (t) uniquely defines the
                                                                                  I
                       crack-tip stress, strain, and displacement fields, but the angular dependence of these quantities
                       is different from the quasistatic case. For example, the stresses in the elastic singularity zone are
                       given by [32, 33, 35]

                                                           Kt()
                                                      σ =    I  f  θ V (, )                      (4.23)
                                                        ij
                                                            2 πr  ij
                       The function f  reduces to the quasistatic case (Table 2.1) when V = 0. Appendix 4.1 outlines the
                                  ij
                       derivation of Equation (4.23) and gives specific relationships for  f  in the case of rapid crack
                                                                              ij
                       propagation. The displacement functions also display an angular dependence that varies with V.
                       Consequently, α  and α  in Equation (4.9) must depend on crack velocity as well as position, and
                                          y
                                    x
                       the Mott analysis is not rigorously correct for dynamic crack propagation.
                       4.1.2.3 Dynamic Toughness

                       As Equation (4.15) indicates, the dynamic stress intensity is equal to K , the dynamic material
                                                                                  ID
                       resistance, which depends on crack speed. This equality permits experimental measurements of K .
                                                                                                    ID
                          Dynamic propagation toughness can be measured as a function of crack speed by means of
                       high-speed photography and optical methods, such as photoelasticity [36, 37] and the method of
                       caustics [38]. Figure 4.10 shows photoelastic fringe patterns for dynamic crack propagation in
                       Homalite 100 [37]. Each fringe corresponds to a contour of maximum shear stress. Sanford and
                       Dally [36] describe procedures for inferring stress intensity from photoelastic patterns.



















                       FIGURE 4.10 Photoelastic fringe patterns for a rapidly propagating crack in Homalite 100. Photograph
                       provided by R. Chona.  Taken from Chona, R., Irwin, G.R., and Shukla, A.,  “Two and  Three Parameter
                       Representation of Crack Tip Stress Fields.” Journal of Strain Analysis, Vol. 17, 1982, pp. 79–86.
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209