Page 76 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 76

1656_C02.fm  Page 56  Thursday, April 14, 2005  6:28 PM





                       56                                    Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications


















                                                                    FIGURE 2.25 Uncracked body subject to an
                                                                    arbitrary boundary traction P(x), which results
                                                                    in a normal stress distribution p(x) acting on
                                                                    Plane A-B.


                       2.6.5 WEIGHT FUNCTIONS

                       When one performs an analysis to infer a stress intensity factor for a cracked body, the K value
                       that is computed applies only to one particular set of boundary conditions; different loading
                       conditions result in a different stress intensity factors for that geometry. It turns out, however, that
                       the solution to one set of boundary conditions contains sufficient information to infer K for any
                       other boundary conditions on that same geometry.
                          Consider two arbitrary loading conditions on an isotropic elastic cracked body in plane stress
                       or plane strain. For now, we assume that both loadings are symmetric with respect to the crack
                       plane, such that pure Mode I loading is achieved in each case. Suppose that we know the stress
                                                                        (2)
                       intensity factor for loading (1) and we wish to solve for K , the stress intensity factor for the
                                                                        I
                                                                        (1)
                       second set of boundary conditions. Rice [15] showed that K and K  are related as follows:
                                                                               (2)
                                                                       I
                                                                              I
                                                    E′      u ∂  ()     u ∂  ()  
                                                                           1
                                                              1
                                             K  ()  =  ()  ∫  T  i  d  Γ  ∫  F +  i  dA        (2.49)
                                               2
                                               I
                                                      1
                                                   2 K I  Γ  i  a ∂  A  i  a ∂  

















                       FIGURE 2.26 Application of superposition to replace a boundary traction P(x) with a crack face traction
                       p(x) that results in the same K I .
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81