Page 158 - From Bombay to Bollywoord The Making of a Global Media Industri
P. 158

Dot-Coms and the Making of an Overseas Territory  >>  145

        Excel spreadsheets presenting an array of web metrics, would render the vast
        overseas territory more readily imaginable as an “NRI audience.” For profes-
        sionals like Mobhani, Qureshi, and Trehan, this meant that the attempt to
        envision an overseas audience required the continual navigation of temporal
        gaps between domestic and overseas, home and abroad. In other words, the
        question of space—of mediating Bollywood’s relationship with an overseas
        audience—was interpreted and resolved in terms of cultural temporality. This
        spatiotemporal fix was successful, I would further argue, insofar as it allowed
        dot-com companies to establish a sense of control over categories like “over-
        seas audience” that are, as Shanti Kumar would suggest, best understood
                                   64
        as “unimaginable communities.”  As distinct from the finite, limited, and
        bounded nature to the imagined communities of print capitalism that Bene-
        dict Anderson defined, Kumar argues that the “unimaginable communities
        of electronic capitalism  .  .  . are infinite, limitless, and unbounded,” given
        the nature of contemporary media circulation across varied spatial scales. 65
        Media flows, Kumar further argues, are “unimaginable both in a literal sense
        of being at the technological limits of imaginative access and in a figurative
                                                66
        sense of becoming limitless in imaginary excess.”  But the fix that the Bom-
        bay-based dot-com companies offered came at a considerable cost. Far from
        offering Bollywood even a glimpse of an infinite audience—a “multiplex with
        unlimited seats,” in Rajat Barjatya’s imagination—and grappling with the
        uneven and heterogeneous terrain of diasporic media circulation and con-
        sumption, Bombay-based dot-com companies reduced the overseas territory
        to a narrowly construed, primarily U.S.-U.K.-centered “NRI audience.” To
        be sure, these companies did succeed in positioning Bollywood as a cultural
        industry capable of imagining and institutionalizing an overseas audience.
        However, the notion of a temporal fix allows us to see how these compa-
        nies’ representational practices and strategies ignored, if not suppressed, the
        unevenness that marks Bollywood’s expansion into new territories.

        Conclusion

        In this chapter, I have traced the emergence of dot-com companies as key
        intermediaries who could reconfigure a vast and vaguely defined overseas
        territory into an enumerable “NRI audience” and thereby shape the film
        industry’s imagination of an overseas territory. I began by situating the devel-
        opment of the dot-com sector in relation to what I have called the diasporic
        bias of the Internet in the Indian context, and how dot-com companies relied
        on and leveraged the Indian diaspora in first world countries to become both
        commercially viable and culturally significant. I then detailed how dot-com
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163