Page 208 - Fundamentals of Computational Geoscience Numerical Methods and Algorithms
P. 208

8.4  Test and Application Examples of the Particle Simulation Method  199

            the distinct element method (Zhao et al. 2007b), the proposed upscale theory for the
            particle simulation is also approximately valid for the post-failure response of the
            particle assembly, as demonstrated in the next section.



            8.4 Test and Application Examples of the Particle
                Simulation Method

            As shown in Fig. 8.7, two samples of different sizes are considered in the particle
            simulation tests. The first test sample is of a small size (1 by 2 m) and is simu-
            lated using 1000 particles. It was noted that if a regular hexagonal lattice, in which
            a particle is in contact with its six neighboring particles, is used in the particle
            simulation (Donze et al. 1994), an unphysical, first-order geometrical control may
                                ◦
            result in well-defined 60 planes of weakness in the lattice. These planes can fur-
            ther control the geometry of the resulting failure (Donze et al. 1994). To prevent the
            above-mentioned effect from taking place, we generate a particle model in which
            the particles are distributed randomly so that the likelihood for the occurrence of
            the preferred planes of weakness can be eliminated. The maximum and minimum
            radii of particles are approximately 0.0172 m and 0.0115 m, resulting in an average
            radius of 0.0144 m. On the other hand, the second test sample is of large size (1 by
            2 km) and is also simulated using 1000 particles. The maximum and minimum radii
            of particles are approximately 17.24 m and 11.49 m, resulting in an average radius
            of 14.37 m. The initial porosity of both the small and the large test samples is set to
            be 0.17 in the particle simulation. The density of the particle material is 2500 kg/m 3
            and the friction coefficient of the particle material is 0.5, while the confining stress is
            assumed to be 10 MPa in the following numerical experiments. Due to a significant























            Fig. 8.7 Two samples of the
            same number of particles but
                                          2
            different sizes          (A)  1× m sample        (B)  1×  2 km sample
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213