Page 101 - Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery
P. 101

89
             Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2

                   high saturation of residual oil. This means a poor volumetric efficiency, which is not
                   desirable [59].
                      In order to overcome this issue, it is recommended to lower CO 2 mobility by
                   decreasing its saturation. This could be done by alternatively injecting CO 2 and water
                   in cycles. This process is called WAG injection. A slug of CO 2 is injected and fol-
                   lowed by water. As water enters into the reservoir, it fills some of the pore spaces,
                   resulting in reduced mobility to CO 2 .
                      Although WAG gives promising results, there are still some problems associated
                   with this mode of injection. For instance, injected water may not be distributed
                   uniformly in the reservoir, causing reduced microscopic efficiency. Indeed, nonuni-
                   form distribution can occur when there is a sufficient vertical permeability. This
                   causes water to move downward while gas will tongue in an upward direction.
                      Another important problem associated with the WAG process is the so-called
                   problem of “water-shielding.” Injected water blocks any possible connections between
                   CO 2 and trapped oil in the porous media that were swept by water injection, leaving
                   a high residual oil saturation. Water blocking is much more significant for water-wet
                   rocks and it is negligible for mixed-wet rocks.
                      The major design issues to be considered for an optimum WAG injection process
                   are WAG ratio, ultimate CO 2 slug size, rock and fluid properties, reservoir characteris-
                   tics and heterogeneity, injection rate, and injection pattern [63,64]. Recently, for an
                   optimized WAG process, researchers are working on the brine composition of water
                   being injected alternatively with CO 2 . A new hybrid method has been proposed as
                   low salinity water (LSW) alternative CO 2 injection. Results show that this new
                   method enhances oil recovery by both LSW and CO 2 effects. Although the results of
                   CO 2  LSW are promising, further research is needed to assess its efficiency [65].





                        3.4 CO 2 INJECTION LABORATORY TESTS

                        As discussed earlier in previous sections, when CO 2 is injected into a reservoir,
                   a series of complex mechanisms will occur. These mechanisms are effective in
                   improving oil recovery. Therefore it is of great importance to know the performance
                   of each mechanism. The performance of a CO 2 flood could only be assessed by
                   experimental investigations in simulated condition of the reservoir. Because reservoirs
                   and CO 2 injection processes vary widely, it is not possible to list a set of laboratory
                   experiments appropriate to all situations. Laboratory experiments performed most
                   often fall into three general classes as follows [66]:
                   • Standard PVT test
                         PVT experiments are commonly performed for determining the relationship
                      between pressure volume temperature. Phase behavior and fluid properties that
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106