Page 106 - Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery
P. 106

94                                                                      Ramin Moghadasi et al.




                     3.8 ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS OF CO 2 INJECTION

                     CO 2 has been known as a byproduct of industrial and domestic operations,
                which is undesirable due to its harmful impacts on the world’s climate. Since the
                Industrial Revolution, a rise of about 30% has been reported in released CO 2 content
                in the atmosphere [85]. Many research studies have been conducted to achieve proper
                ways for mitigating CO 2 . Recently, and to a greater extent of innovation, geological
                sequestration has been known to be a promising option that may lead to significant
                reduction of CO 2 . Beside this sequestering opportunity, underground CO 2 injection
                serves as an opportunity for increased oil recovery. Indeed, nowadays CO 2 EOR is
                being studied along with the opportunities of CO 2 sequestration. This is because oil
                reservoir has such characteristics that could bring the opportunity of CO 2 sequestra-
                tion. Generally, there are three major mechanisms by which CO 2 could be seques-
                tered within the oil reservoirs. The first is hydrodynamic trapping, in which CO 2 gas
                would be trapped beneath a cap rock. The next is related to CO 2 solubility in water
                and oil phases, which is known as solubility trapping. Lastly, CO 2 can react with res-
                ervoir rock and organic matter, directly or indirectly, and can be converted into the
                solid phase. However, each of these mechanisms can alter the injection and produc-
                tion efficiency toward reduction of injection and production efficiency. For instance,
                when CO 2 is converted into a solid phase, it may lead to permeability impairment.
                As a result, the injectivity is reduced [11,86].
                   To measure the storage capacity of a reservoir, specific capacity of the rock could
                be used. Indeed, this value could be used to differentiate sequestration potential
                among reservoirs. Specific storage capacity is expressed by Eq. (3.8) as follows [87]:

                                            ð
                                       C 5 ρ 1 2 S or 2 S wir Þ[1 S wir [C s          (3.26)
                where ρ is CO 2 density, which is a function of pressure and temperature; S or indicates
                the residual oil saturation; S wir stands for the irreducible water saturation; [ shows the
                rock porosity; and C s symbolizes the mass of CO 2 dissolved per unit volume of water.
                Based on this equation, a reservoir that is deep and has a sizeable porosity in which a
                large fraction of moveable fluids is contained would lead to maximum CO 2 sequestra-
                tion potential.
                   Eq. (3.26) describes the total possible amount of the CO 2 that could be stored
                within a reservoir. In real conditions, this capacity depends on many factors, including
                reservoir heterogeneity, aquifer availability, reservoir boundaries, and geophysical
                aspects. Reservoirs with a high degree of heterogeneity have less potential for com-
                bined efficient storage and EOR purposes. This is because CO 2 breakthrough occurs
                at early stages when there is high permeability variation within the reservoir (i.e.,
                high degree of heterogeneity). Aquifers are categorized as bottom water or edge water
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111