Page 406 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 406

386   GAS SHALE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

            are either naturally occurring gas in water sands or problems   that shale gas production has a GHG footprint that is 20–50%
            caused by mistakes in well design—improper cementing—  lower than for coal.
            not related to fracking.                               In the 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)
              No one is saying that there are no potential risks to water   study, researchers argue that the amount of methane emis-
            resources from hydraulic fracturing. However, available   sions caused by shale gas production has been largely exag-
            scientific  literature  appears  to  support  a  cautiously  opti-  gerated (O’Sullivan and Paltsev, 2012). Their analysis was
            mistic view of the dangers posed by fracking to freshwater   based on data from each of the approximately 4000 wells
            supplies. Studies have thus far failed to establish any   drilled in the five main U.S. shale‐drilling sites during 2010.
            systematic relationship between drilling activity and water   Wells in two of those sites, Texas’ Barnett shale and the
            pollution. Others caution that although the studies do not   Haynesville shale on the Texas‐Louisiana boarder, had been
            confirm any cases of drinking water contamination caused   studied  by  Robert  Howarth  from  Cornell  University  last
            by fracking, which does not mean that such contamination is   year when he looked at potential emissions released by the
            impossible or that hydraulic fracturing chemicals cannot get   industry.
            loose in the environment in other ways such as through spills   In studying potential emissions, where Howarth found
            of produced water.                                   252 mg of methane emissions per well in the Barnett site and
              Definitive evidence may have to wait until the EPA com-  4638 mg per well in the Haynesville site, the MIT researchers,
            pletes in 2014 its study of hydraulic fracturing and its poten-  using their comprehensive well dataset, found that the poten-
            tial impact on drinking water resources (EPA, December   tial emissions per well in the Barnett and Haynesville sites
            2012a). Nonetheless two things are clear: in areas of frack-  were in fact 147 mg of methane (273 thousand cubic meters
            ing, in order to trace the source of contamination, there is a   of natural gas) and 633 mg (1,177 thousand cubic meters of
            need to know what chemicals are being used in the fracking   gas), respectively. When accounting for actual gas handling
            process before fracking starts. Secondly, proper baseline   field practices, these emission estimates were reduced to
            water sampling needs to be conducted prior to the start of   about 35 mg per well of methane from an average Barnett
            drilling.                                            well and 151 mg from an average Haynesville well.  The
                                                                 MIT study found that companies are already capturing about
                                                                 70% of potential “fugitive” emissions.
            18.5  METHANE EMISSIONS                                In April 2013, EPA dramatically lowered its estimate of
                                                                 how much of a potent heat‐trapping gas leaks during natural
            Methane emissions from natural gas extraction, especially   gas production in its latest GHG inventory to less than half
            shale gas, has been getting a lot of attention as environmen-  of what had been previously estimated (EPA, April 2013).
            talists focus on the full life cycle of energy production and   Among the key findings of the analysis:
            use and the amount of natural gas that is released into the
            atmosphere unburned as part of the hydraulic fracturing pro-  (i)  The effective natural gas emissions rate per unit of
            cess, transportation by pipelines, and from compressors and   natural gas production is 1.5%. This emissions rate
            processing units. The issue of methane leaks has caused a   is lower than earlier estimates of 2.2–2.4% using
            major  split  between  environmental  groups.  Since  power   data from prior EPA inventories for 2009 and 2010.
            plants that burn natural gas emit about half the amount of the   (ii)  The EPA revised its estimates of natural gas system
            greenhouse gases as coal‐fired power plants, the recent shift   methane emissions downward 33% for 2010, from
            to gas‐fired generation has allowed the United States to   215.4 million metric tons of carbon dioxide
            become the only major industrialized country to signifi-   equivalent in the 2012 inventory to 143.6 MMTe in
            cantly reduce greenhouse emissions. But others believe the   the 2013 inventory.
            methane leaks during the production of shale gas negate any   (iii)  The  long‐term  trend  for methane  emissions  from
            benefits over coal substitution, since methane is a highly   natural gas systems is downward. Annual methane
            potent greenhouse gas.                                     emissions  have  dropped  10%  since  1990  and  are
              A controversial paper by Cornell’s Robert Howarth jump‐
            started this debate (Howarth et al., 2011). He argued that   17% below the all‐time peak set in 2007.
            natural gas from fracking operations can be worse for the   (iv)  Distribution system methane emissions have
            atmosphere than coal because of methane seepage into       dropped 16% since 1990, even as the industry added
            the atmosphere. Another Cornell study also suggested that   nearly 300,000 miles of distribution mains to serve
            life  cycle greenhouse gas emissions from shale gas are    17 million more customers, an increase of 30% in
            20–100% higher than coal on a 20‐year timeframe basis.     both cases.
            Studies by DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory
            (NETL), The Worldwatch  Institute,  Carnegie  Mellon,  and   In August 2013, scientists with the National Oceanic and
            Deutsche Bank challenged these conclusions and showed   Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the University of
   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411