Page 403 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 403

THE DISPOSAL AND REUSE OF FRACKING WASTEWATER  383
            in storage, accidental spills and mismanagement can cause   The amount of wastewater being disposed of in  Texas
            releases to the environment that could contaminate nearby   wells has skyrocketed with the spread of fracking, to nearly
            waters and soils.                                    3.5 billion barrels in 2011 from 46 million barrels in 2005,
              In November 2010, the Pennsylvania Department of   according to data from the TRC. On average, companies in
            Environmental Protection (PADEP) discovered a discharge   Texas dispose of 290 million barrels of wastewater—
            during an inspection of the Penn Township facility, where   equivalent to about 18,500 Olympic‐size swimming pools
            a PADEP inspector observed wastewater spilling from an   every month,  The Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation
            open valve from a series of interconnected tanks. At the   Commission, charged with both promoting and regulating
            time, XTO Energy Inc., a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil   the oil and gas industry, has issued over 3000 permits letting
            Corporation, stored wastewater generated from energy   companies dispose of liquid waste in evaporative ponds,
            extraction activities conducted throughout Pennsylvania at   shallow pits, and in 300 plus super‐deep injection wells.
            its Penn Township facility and, at the time of the release,   In states like Pennsylvania where, according to PADEP
            stored produced  fluid  from  its  operations  in  the  area.   data, over 8418 Marcellus wells have been permitted as of
            Pollutants from the release were found in a tributary of the   August 2013, there are few Class 2 wells. New York State
            Susquehanna River basin.                             has no disposal wells. The lack of injection wells has led to
              EPA, in consultation with PADEP, conducted an investi-  a significant increase in the amount of wastewater trucked to
            gation and determined that wastewater stored in the tanks at   Ohio for disposal via underground injection, from roughly
            the Penn Township facility contained the same variety of pol-  26 million gallons in 2010 to 106 million gallons in 2011. In
            lutants, including chlorides, barium, strontium, and total dis-  2012, Ohio injection wells handled 588 million gallons of
            solved solids, that were observed in those surface waters   wastewater, the majority of which was received from
            (EPA, 2013a).  The federal settlement between parties   Pennsylvania (Ohio and Fracking, 2013). After a series of
            required that XTO implement a comprehensive plan to   small earthquakes near Ohio disposal sites in 2011, Ohio
            improve wastewater management practices to recycle, prop-  regulators now require far lengthier and more thorough
            erly dispose of, and prevent spills of wastewater generated   review of geological records which will make underground
            from natural gas exploration and production activities in   disposal there much more expensive.
            Pennsylvania and West Virginia (XTO Energy, 2013).     According to a study by researchers at Kent State and
              Historically, the practice of disposing of waste in deep   Duke University, despite producing less wastewater per unit
            injection wells has not gotten much attention. However, in   of gas produced than a conventional gas well, developing the
            many regions of the country, injection wells have become   Marcellus shale has increased the total wastewater generated
            the preferred method for disposing of the liquid waste (pri-  in the region by about 570% since 2004, overwhelming
            marily oil‐field brine) produced during the hydraulic frac-  existing  wastewater  disposal  infrastructure  capacity  (Lutz
            turing process. In the Southwest United States, producers   et al., 2013). Wastewater was initially shipped to publicly
            reinject the wastewater into abandoned wells. Injection   owned wastewater treatment plants. These treatment plants
            wells are not impacted by waste type or contaminants dur-  were designed to treat municipal or county wastewater, and
            ing disposal. The 1974 Clean Water Act, among other things,   can remove biological contaminants and some heavy metals
            requires EPA to protect underground sources of drinking   but are far less capable of removing radioactive contami-
            water and granted EPA the power to regulate injection wells.   nants. When wastewater is sent to municipal sewage facil-
            Injection wells are classified into six classes according to   ities, harmful chemicals  and other pollutants are merely
            the type of fluid they inject and where the fluid is injected.   diluted, rather than removed, and then released into the
            Class 2 wells inject fluids associated with oil and natural gas   state’s rivers, lakes and streams potentially affecting drinking
            production operations (EPA Classes of Injection Wells). In   water supplies.
            the United States, there are more than 151,000 waste‐Class   On April 19, 2011, the PADEP asked all Marcellus Shale
            2 injection wells. More than 2 billion gallons of waste,   natural gas drilling operators to stop delivering wastewater
            mostly brine, from oil and gas drilling and production are   from shale gas extraction to 15 different wastewater treatment
            injected into those wells every day.                 plants around the Pittsburgh region by May 19. This request
              States like Texas have many deep underground injection   was greatly influenced by research conducted by a Carnegie
            wells where companies dispose of the salty and chemical‐   Mellon river monitoring project that showed elevated levels
            and mineral‐laden shale wastewater. The state has more than   of bromide in the Monongahela River, a source of drinking
            8000 active  disposal wells,  about 850 of which  are large   water for over 800,000 people in southwestern Pennsylvania.
            commercial operations, according to the  Texas Railroad   Carnegie Mellon University Professor Jeanne  VanBreisen
            Commission (TRC), the regulator of oil and gas production.   was first to discover high levels of bromides in drinking
            Texas has another 25,000 wells that accept waste fluids and   water sourced from rivers that have received treated fracking
            use them to retrieve additional oil and gas (Texas Railroad   wastewater (VanBriesen, 2012). Bromide itself is nontoxic,
            Commission, 2013).                                   except when it reacts with the chlorine that is used during
   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408