Page 398 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 398

378   GAS SHALE CHALLENGES OVER THE ASSET LIFE CYCLE

                    several drilling days.  A rotary steerable system   10.  The type of wellbore completion used directly affects
                  (RSS) is typically more efficient due to its automatic   efficiency during the fracturing process.
                  steering capability and results in a much better hole   11.  Each completion technique has its own benefits and
                  condition than provided by motors.                   considerations, dependent on application and the
                   • Drilling optimization increases drilling efficiency   current phase of the asset life cycle.
                  and reduces days on wells (cost).                12.  Use plug‐and‐perf during appraisal phase to provide
                   • Effective well placement using reservoir navigation   flexibility of stage placement, resulting in more time
                  maximizes reservoir exposure and locates the well    to gather data.
                  in the sweet spots.                              13.  Ball‐activated systems  provide  efficiency during
                   • Environmentally friendly  WBM, which is more      development phase (when more information is
                  economic and provides the preferred characteristics   known about the reservoir). This type of completion
                  of an OBM, is recommended for drilling the curve     system is preferred by operators in liquids plays.
                  and lateral.                                     14.  Coiled tubing–activated systems offer accuracy and
              4.  A successful fracture stimulation is the one that    contingency options and can result in optimized fracs
                 increases productivity index as well as ultimate      during the development phase. These systems can be
                 recovery of a producing well in an economic, safe, and   run in both open‐hole and cased hole completions.
                 environmentally friendly manner.  This involves not
                 only executing a proper treatment design but also the   Production Phase
                 placement of the frac stages at the proper place along
                 the horizontal lateral.                           1.  Monitor  and  control  the  flowback  rate  of  the  com-
              5.  Overcoming all of the hydraulic fracturing challenges   pleted well in order to optimize total recovery and pre-
                 of (a) achieving designed fracture geometry, (b) trans-  vent well damage.
                 porting proppant to the right location, (c) achieving   2.  Periodically, run PLTs to assess production problems
                 final conductivity, (d) encountering expected reservoir   and consider possible remedial well work.
                 properties, and (e) avoiding geohazards will certainly   3.  Manage the complete water cycle—sourcing for dril-
                 lead to the “optimum fracturing treatment.”         ling and fracture water; lifting, treating, handling,
              6.  The design of the frac begins with collecting a number   storage, and disposal of well flowback water.
                 of key parameters about the reservoir and the well.   4.  Install artificial lift if required.
                 These data are used as input in a fracture simulator   5.  Implement production chemical monitoring and
                 (recommended) to design the treatment with proper   treatment equipment and programs.
                 frac fluid, proppant, additives, and pumping schedule.   6.  Protect the environment throughout all operations,
                 There is no optimum, one‐size‐fits‐all stimulation   especially when hydrocarbons and water are brought
                 design for shale wells; each frac design is dependent   to the surface.
                 on  the  parameters  of  a  specific  well  in  a  specific
                 formation, at a specific location, and for the type of
                 produced fluid expected.                        Rejuvenation Phase
              7.  Use microseismic while implementing the frac in   1.  Evaluate wells as re‐frac candidates. Select the appro-
                 order to obtain near real‐time information to control   priate wells and conduct the re‐frac operation. Refracs
                 frac direction and limit loss. Microseismic also pro-  have been determined to be the one significant method
                 vides an approximate stimulated reservoir volume for   to arrest the rapid decline in shale wells and increase
                 input into a reservoir simulator to determine predicted   production rate.
                 recovery.                                         2.  Redevelopment (probably infill drilling) can be con-
              8.  In order to place the frac stages and perforation clus-  sidered when the primary development in the sweet
                 ters in the optimum location along the lateral, the lat-  spots of the field have been or are nearing depletion.
                 eral should be characterized in order to obtain critical
                 information about natural and conductive fractures
                 and reservoir characteristics.                  ACkNOWLEDGMENTS
              9.  Characterizing the lateral to obtain these two different
                 data aspects can be accomplished by running an LWD   This author would like to thank the management of Baker
                 high‐definition image log (for fracture information)   Hughes for allowing him to write and contribute this chapter
                 and running advanced mud logging with cuttings anal-  to the book. I would also like to thank and show my appreci-
                 ysis (mineralogy and reservoir data).           ation to the members of the Baker Hughes Unconventional
   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403