Page 25 - Fundamentals of Geomorphology
P. 25

8     INTRODUCING LANDFORMS AND LANDSCAPES


                According to Penck’s arguments, slopes may either  Eduard Brückner and Albrecht Penck’s (Walther’s
              recede at the original gradient or else flatten, accord-  father) work on glacial effects on the Bavarian Alps and
              ing to circumstances. Many textbooks claim that Penck  their forelands provided the first insights into the effects
              advocated ‘parallel retreat of slopes’, but this is a false  of the Pleistocene ice ages on relief (Penck and Brückner
              belief (see Simons 1962). Penck (1953, 135–6) argued  1901–9). Their classic river-terrace sequence gave names
              that a steep rock face would move upslope, maintain-  to the main glacial stages – Donau, Gunz, Mindel, Riss,
              ing its original gradient, but would soon be eliminated  and Würm – and sired Quaternary geomorphology.
              by a growing basal slope. If the cliff face was the scarp
              of a tableland, however, it would take a long time to
              disappear. He reasoned that a lower-angle slope, which  Modern historical geomorphology
              startsgrowingfromthebottomofthebasalslope,replaces  Historical geomorphology has developed since Davis’s
              the basal slope. Continued slope replacement then leads  time, and the interpretation of long-term changes of
              to a flattening of slopes, with steeper sections formed  landscape no longer relies on the straitjacket of the geo-
              during earlier stages of development sometimes surviv-  graphical cycle. It relies now on various chronological
              ing in summit areas (Penck 1953, 136–41). In short,  analyses, particularly those based on stratigraphical stud-
              Penck’s complicated analysis predicted both slope reces-  ies of Quaternary sediments, and upon a much fuller
              sion and slope decline, a result that extends Davis’s  appreciation of geomorphic and tectonic processes (e.g.
              simple idea of slope decline (Figure 1.3). Field stud-  Brown 1980). Observed stratigraphical relationships fur-
              ies have confirmed that slope retreat is common in a  nish relative chronologies, whilst absolute chronologies
              wide range of situations. However, a slope that is actively  derive from sequences dated using historical records,
              eroded at its base (by a river or by the sea) may decline if  radiocarbon analysis, dendrochronology, luminescence,
              the basal erosion should stop. Moreover, a tableland scarp  palaeomagnetism, and so forth (p. 354). Such quantita-
              retains its angle through parallel retreat until the erosion  tive chronologies offer a means for calculating long-term
              removes the protective cap rock, when slope decline sets  rates of change in the landscape.
              in (Ollier and Tuddenham 1962).
                                                          It is perhaps easiest to explain modern historical geo-
                                                        morphology by way of an example. Take the case of
              Eduard Brückner and Albrecht Penck        the river alluvium and colluvium that fills many valleys
                                                        in countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea. Claudio
              Other early historical geomorphologists used geologi-  Vita-Finzi (1969) pioneered research into the origin
              cally young sediments to interpret Pleistocene events.  of the valley fills, concluding that almost all alluvium



                      Slope recession or backwearing             Slope decline or downwearing
                               (Penck)                                    (Davis)


                                                     Time
                      6      5     4      3     2   1    1   2      3
                                                                          4
                                                                                 5
                                                                                          6

                                   Pediplain
                                                                    eneplain
                                   P ediplain                      P Peneplain
              Figure 1.3 Slope recession, which produces a pediplain (p. 381) and slope decline, which produces a peneplain.
              Source: Adapted from Gossman (1970)
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30