Page 87 - Fundamentals of Magnetic Thermonuclear Reactor Design
P. 87

Simulation of Electromagnetic Fields  Chapter | 4    71





























             FIGURE 4.1  Simplified 3D model of the ITER complex, taking into account the ferromag-
             netic inserts and steel rebars of the building. (1) The bioshield, (2) the cylinder formed by build-
             ing elements and steel doors, (3) the base, (4) the bioshield lid, (5) the walls, and (6) the base of the
             aseismic section. One-fourth segment is cut away to show the interior.




             ment is important when it comes to analysing a magnetic field ripple, electrical
               breakdown conditions, error fields caused by magnet fabrication/assembly
             tolerances, and so on.
                An algorithm for EM simulations in the frames of general computer tech-
             nology may be reduced to the following sequence of steps (as in the case of the
             ITER machine):

             l  Calculations of plasma-physical parameters with 2D plasma equilibrium or
                MHD codes to determine TFC and PFC currents, plasma current, toroidal
                magnetic flux associated with the plasma, halo current, and so on.
             l  3D simulation of EM transients.
             l  Calculation of electro-mechanical and thermal loads due to eddy currents.
             l  Combined EM and stress analyses.
             l  Combined analysis of EM, thermal and thermo-hydraulic processes, partic-
                ularly important for energy-intensive, cryo-vacuum and cryogenic  systems.
                At each modelling stage, results obtained at previous stages are used as in-
             puts. Several iterations are often used to optimise a technical solution. Simu-
             lations may involve the use of computational models of different complexity
             (Figs.  4.1–4.4), and should take into account a large number of meaningful
             factors to provide overall consistency of the design and performance criteria:
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92