Page 195 - Fundamentals of Physical Volcanology
P. 195

9780632054435_4_011.qxd  12/10/2007  12:33PM  Page 172





                    172  CHAPTER 11



                  11.3 Hazard assessment                      eruption taking place within one generation is
                                                              extremely small, it could be argued from a prag-
                  There are several aspects to assessing volcanic   matic sociological viewpoint that assessing a vol-
                  hazards. The first step is to decide what constitutes  canic hazard is not the most urgent issue if other
                  a hazard, and there are both physical and statis-  problems, such as flood, earthquake, tsunami, dis-
                  tical aspects to this. Many centers of population   ease and war, are more likely to affect the local
                  are located close to volcanoes known to have   population.
                  been active in historic time – the city of Naples   If a volcano erupts sufficiently frequently, there
                  near Mount Vesuvius in Italy is a good example.   are likely to be well-preserved deposits from at least
                  For people in areas such as these, being overrun   the most recent eruptions. Geologists can identify
                  by a lava flow or ash flow is an obvious potential  and map out these deposits, so that the common
                  threat; but there is a less obvious hazard: being  styles and scales of activity are readily apparent.
                  killed in the crash of an aircraft with ash-choked  The most likely ranges of distances from the vol-
                  engines, which could happen to those same citi-  cano at which people will be at risk from the vari-
                  zens while on vacation in many other parts of   ous kinds of activity can be defined and drawn on a
                  the world.                                  map of the area. Furthermore, eruption products
                    This introduces the idea of local, regional, and  can be dated in various ways, by radiocarbon or
                  global volcanic hazards. Global hazards involve   tree-ring dating of dead vegetation trapped in the
                  volcanoes injecting large amounts of gas, aerosols,  deposits, or other isotopic dating methods, and the
                  or small ash particles into the atmosphere and  typical repose periods between events of a given
                  changing the climate, as considered in Chapter 12.  scale can be established. Conversely, for volca-
                  Regional hazards include the effects on aircraft  noes that erupt extremely infrequently, the state of
                  operations of ash falling from eruption clouds,   preservation of even the most recent deposit may
                  and such phenomena as the collapse of volcanoes  be very poor, to the point where they are unrecog-
                  erupting in the ocean, which can generate tsunami  nizable. In the cases of many of the mountains of
                  waves traveling great distances. Local hazards  the Andes and central America, for example, it was
                  include all of the products of eruptions that are  not realized until the advent of modern geology that
                  emplaced close to the volcanic source – lava flows,  they “were” volcanoes. For these types of volca-
                  pyroclastic density currents, and fall deposits.  noes we have to fall back on our knowledge of how
                    Historically, it is local hazards that have received  other similar volcanic centers in similar tectonic

                  most attention because they are generally the easi-  settings have behaved to assess the likely extent of
                  est to identify. Even so, prior to the 20th century  the hazards. Once the range of likely future behav-
                  the best indicators of volcanic activity were quite  ior patterns of a particular volcano has been deter-
                  likely to be the memories of local inhabitants, and  mined, the next step is to estimate when the next
                  this underlines one of the potential problems in  eruption is likely to occur. On short time scales this
                  dealing with hazards. If a volcanic eruption (or any  is best done by geophysical monitoring, which is
                  other kind of catastrophe for that matter) has not  considered in the next section. On longer time
                  happened within the memory of one’s grandpar-  scales, it is done mainly on the basis of the statis-
                  ents, it is simply not perceived as a likely threat. Yet  tics of previous eruptions. The best that can be
                  many kinds of natural disaster, including eruptions,  produced is the probability of an eruption of a
                  have return periods (the most likely intervals  given magnitude occurring within a given period
                  between occurrences) of at least tens of thousands  of time.
                  of years. It is only since the emergence of system-  One way of making a statistical appraisal of pos-
                  atic geological mapping, and the development of   sible future activity is to classify previous eruptions
                  a basic theoretical understanding of what kind of  by the Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) as defined
                  eruption produces a given type of deposit, that the  in Table 10.3 and to compile a list of how many
                  true potential hazard of many volcanic systems   eruptions of a given VEI rating have occurred in a
                  has been perceived. And where the likelihood of an  given interval of time. Table 11.1 shows an example
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200