Page 282 - Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers
P. 282

Parameter Estimation                                            265

             Before proceeding, a remark is in order regarding the notation to be used. As seen
           in Equation (9.2), our objective in parameter estimation is to determine a statistic

                                   ^
                                     ˆ h…X 1 ; X 2 ; ... ; X n †;        …9:20†

           which gives a good estimate of parameter . This statistic will be called an

           estimator for  , for which properties, such as mean, variance, or distribution,
           provide a measure of quality of this estimator. Once we have observed sample
           values x 1 , x 2 ,..., x n , the observed estimator,
                                    ^
                                     ˆ h…x 1 ; x 2 ; ... ; x n †;        …9:21†
           has a numerical value and will be called an estimate of parameter  .



           9.2.1  UNBIASEDNESS
                       ^
           An estimator    is said to be an unbiased estimator for    if

                                          ^
                                        Ef gˆ  ;                         …9:22†

                                                   ^
           for all . This is clearly a desirable property for   , which states that, on average,

                    ^
           we expect    to be close to true parameter value . Let us note here that the

           requirement of unbiasedness may lead to other undesirable consequences.
           Hence, the overall quality of an estimator does not rest on any single criterion
           but on a set of criteria.
                                              2
             We have studied two statistics, X and S , in Sections 9.1.1 and 9.1.2. It is seen
                                                   2
           from Equations (9.5) and (9.8) that, if X and S are used as estimators for the
           population mean m and population variance   2 , respectively, they are unbiased
                                         2
           estimators. This nice property for S suggests that the sample variance defined
           by Equation (9.7) is preferred over the more natural choice obtained by repla-
           cing 1/(n    1) by 1/n in Equation (9.7). Indeed, if we let
                                           n
                                        1  X        2
                                    2
                                   S  ˆ     …X i   X† ;                  …9:23†
                                        n
                                          iˆ1
           its mean is
                                             n   1  2
                                        2
                                    EfS gˆ          ;
                                               n
           and estimator S  2   has a bias indicated by the coefficient (n    1)/n.








                                                                            TLFeBOOK
   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287