Page 59 - Gas Purification 5E
P. 59

Alkanolamines-for Hydrogen Surfide and Carbon Dioxide Removal   49

                  case, sufficient data and operating experience with several alkanolamhes are on hand to pennit
                  a judicious selection of the treating solution for a wide range of conditions. In many cases,
                  process requirements can be met by a numbex of dEerent amiues [or other processes) and an
                  economic analysis is required A comparison of holamines used for gas purification, based
                  on selected physical Properties and appro-ximate  cost, is shown in Table 2-1.
                  Monoethanolamine

                   Aqueous monoethanolamine solutions, which were used almost exclusively for many
                  years for the removal of H2S  and C02 from natural and certain synthesis gases. are rapidly
                  being replaced by other more efficient systems. particularly for the treatment of high-pres-
                  sure natural gases. However, monoethanolamine is still the preferred solvent for gas streams
                  containing relatively low concentrations of H2S and CO:  and essentially no minor contami-
                  nants such as COS and CS2. This is especially true when the gas is to be treated at low pres-
                  sures, and maximum removal of H2S and COz is required. The low molecular weight of
                  monoethanolamine, resulting in high solution capacity at moderate concentrations (on a
                  weight basis), its high alkakity, and the relative ease with which it can be reclaimed from
                  conlaminated solutions (see Chapter 3) are advantages, which in many cases more than
                  counterbalance inherent disadvantages. Among the latter, the most serious one is the forma-



                                               Table 2-1
                                    Physical Properties of Albnolamines

                   Property        MEA*     DEA*     TEA*    MDEA*  DPA*  DGA**
                   Mol. weight      61.09    105.14   149.19   119.17   133.19   105.14
                   Specific .gravity,   1.0179   1.0919   1.1258   1.0418   0.9890   1.0550
                    W2"C             -     (3o/u)=cj   -       -     (45/20"C)   -
                   Boiling point, "C
                    760 mmHg         171    bmp.      360     247.2   248.7    21 1
                    50 mmHg         100       187     7@       164     167      -
                     10 mmHg         69      150      108      128     133      -
                   Vapor pressure,
                    mmHg at 20°C    0.36     0.01     0.01    0.01     0.01    0.01
                   Freezing point, =c   10.5   28.0   21.2    -21.0    42      -9.5
                   Solubility in water,
                    5% by weight at 10°C  Complete   96.4   Complete   Complete   87   Complete
                   Absolute viscosity.
                    cps at 20°C     21.1   38O(3O0C)   1,013   101   198(45"C)  26(24'C)
                   Heat of vaporization.
                    Btu/lb at 1 atm   355   288(23mm)   230    223    184.5    219.1
                                           (168.5'C)
                   Approximate cost,
                    Wb***           0.59     0.60     0.61     1-40    -       0.93
                    YO^:
                    *Data of L%im Carbide Chemicals ConPany f1957, acq forpricing.
                   **Data  of Je&rson  Chemical Companyl Inc. N969) aceptforp&ing.
                   ***Kenney (1993). Priw are for bulksales. AddSO.lOperpmdfbr dium sales.
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64