Page 77 - Gas Adsorption Equilibria
P. 77

1. Basic Concepts                                                  63


             indicating thermodynamic instability which  actually  could not be
             observed in  any  of the several  experiments  performed with this  system.
             Hence  also  proposition  (P2)  should not be  used at high  sorptive gas
             pressures.


          3) These data present absolute amounts of adsorbed masses calculated from
                    by using proposition (P3), i. e. optimization procedure (1.38) with
             the Langmuirian isotherm (1.49). The data fit is reasonably well, cp. Table
             1.7. Also data increase monotonously with increasing gas density, i. e. the
             stability condition (1.47)







             holds.

          4) These data also present absolute masses of   adsorbed on the AC Norit
             R1  which have been calculated by proposition (P4) (1.43), i. e. taking the
             (changing) volume  of the  adsorbate  phase           into account.
             The volume       of the  AC impenetrable to the  molecules has been
             calculated by  the  optimization procedure  (1.44)  using the adsorption
             isotherm (1.49). Data can easily be fitted by the Langmuir isotherm (1.49).
             Also the thermodynamic stability condition (1.47) holds.


             As one can recognize from the curves (1-4), all model assumption lead to
          nearly the same results for low gas densities            However, big
          differences occur for high gas pressures         Also, thermodynamics
          inconsistencies occur for high gas pressures if the helium approximation for
          the  void  volume          is used as in  propositions  (P1,P2). No  such
          inconsistencies could be observed for propositions (P3, P4) using a value of
              fitted to Eq. (1.49) and the experimental   This can be more clearly
          seen from the respective data of all the fits included in Table 1.7.
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82