Page 32 - Geochemical Remote Sensing of The Sub-Surface
P. 32

Genesis,  behaviour and detection of gases in the crust                9

           and unevenness  of the pores,  the  shape,  orientation and size distribution of the  solid phase
           and the degree of water-saturation of the system.
              Experimental investigations have determined the diffusivity of different gases in various
           porous  soil and overburden materials. The periods calculated for gases to travel a particular
           distance vary considerably (Table 1-II). Mercury vapour diffuses in 15 days through  10 m of
           sand  whereas  5.7  years  are  required  for  Kr  to  pass  through  10  m  of  fine-grained  playa
           sediments.

           TABLE 1-II

           Diffusion rates for gases through porous overburden

           Gas   Overburden       Apparent diffusion coefficient (cm 2 S -1)   Transit time,  10m
           Kr    Playa sediment     0.00387  (Robertson, 1969)            5.7 years
           Rn    Desert soil        0.036   (Tanner, 1964a)               225 days
           Hg   Clay                0.05   (Ruan et ai., 1985a)           162 days
           Hg    Sand               0.56   (Ruan et al., 1985a)            15 days



              In  an  ideal  case  a  source  at  depth  liberating  a  gas  into  a  homogeneous  porous
           medium that,  at some distance  from the  source,  is open to the atmosphere  establishes by
           diffusion  a  hemispherical  halo  in  the  porous  medium.  The  time  taken  to  establish  the
           halo  varies  up  to  many  years,  depending  upon  the  thickness  of  the  medium  and  the
           diffusivity of the gas in it. Once  established,  however,  the halo  is persistent provided  the
           supply of gas from the source is maintained. Gas concentration  in the hemispherical halo
           falls  with  increasing  distance  from the  source  such  that, near  to  its  intersection  with the
           ground  surface,  the halo presents  as a broad  symmetrical zone  with peak  concentrations
           directly above  the source.  To compare  this  ideal case with more complex  settings,  Ruan
           et  al.  (1985b)  employed  numerical  modelling  techniques  based  on  the  alternating
           direction  method  for  the  solution  of  finite  difference  equations.  Their  results  allow
           comparison  of the  shapes  of halos  of the  same  gas diffusing  through  media  of different
           homogeneity  from  sources  of different  sizes  (Fig.  1-1).  The  ideal  hemisphere  (Fig.  1-
           1A)  is  perturbed  whenever  the  diffusing  gas  comes  into  contact  with  a  medium  of
           different porosity.  The vertical boundaries of the model imply contact with rocks of zero
           permeability bounding  a porous  medium in which  gas is diffusing.  When the  gas  flux  is
           sufficiently strong for gas to reach these contacts, gas is then channelled upward  (Fig.  1-
           1B).  Horizontal  boundaries  in  the  model  separate  media  of different  porosity.  Where  a
           low-porosity  medium  (e.g.,  clay)  lies  above  a  more  porous  medium  (e.g.,  sand)  gas
           diffuses  from  a  source  in  bedrock  with  relative  ease  until  it  reaches  the  inter-layer
           boundary,  along  which  it  can  more  easily  migrate  laterally  than  vertically  (Fig.  1-1C).
           Preferential lateral gas migration might proceed as far as an impermeable medium, at the
           boundary  of  which  the  gas  largely  retained  in  the  more  porous  medium  at  depth  is
           diverted upward  (Fig.  1-1D).  In this  case,  gas  does  not reach the  surface  directly  above
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37