Page 35 - Geochemical Remote Sensing of The Sub-Surface
P. 35

12                                                                M. Hale

           flow into the soil in response  to a pressure  increase  and to leave the  soil in response  to a
           fall  in  pressure.  These  pressure  changes  are  relatively  slow  and  the  effects  in  the  soil
           tend  to  show  little  detectable  time  lag.  An  increase  in  barometric  pressure  compresses
           downward  the  soil  air  originally  occupying  the  pores  whilst  a  decrease  in  barometric
           pressure  induces  egress  of soil air into  the atmosphere.  Turbulent  wind blowing  as gusts
           across  the  surface  of soil produces  slight but numerous  changes  in pressure  and  adds  to
           the  pumping  effects  of longer-amplitude  meteorological  pressure  changes.  Wind  speed
           has  been  shown  to  influence  the  rate  of  loss  of water  vapour  from  soil  (Acharya  and
           Prihar,  1969)  and  the  same  is  likely  to  apply  to  the  rate  of  loss  of  other  gases.
           Temperature  affects  the  volume  that  air  occupies  and  hence  its  pressure.  Diurnal
           temperature  variations  are  rapid  but  confined  to  the  near-surface  zone;  seasonal
           variations are more pervasive.
              In the near-surface,  where gas geochemistry samples and measurements are acquired,
           mass  flow  is  a  source  of background  variations  that  tend  to  obscure  any  signal  arriving
           from depth.  The  interplay of the  many different  causes  of variation has  proved  a serious
           impediment  to  the  provision  of  interpretable  gas  data  in  exploration  and  this  has
           prompted  a  number  of field  investigations  (Hinkle,  (1990).  In  comparatively  elaborate
           studies,  Klusman  and  Webster  (1981)  and  Klusman  and  Jaacks  (1987)  monitored  many
           of the sources  of variation  along  with emissions of Hg,  Rn and  He.  By stepwise multiple
           regression  they found that air temperature,  soil temperature, barometric pressure,  relative
           humidity  and  soil  moisture  exerted  most  influence  on  gas  concentrations.  However,
           even  if such monitoring  could  be  used  for  gas  data  noise  reduction,  it is  not  practical  to
           monitor  so  many  sources  of  variation  as  part  of  an  exploration  programme.  Rather,  in
           practice,  the  problems  tend  to  be  alleviated  by  sampling  as  far  as  possible  below  the
           ground surface and/or  integrating the signal over a considerable period  of time.



           Gas streaming

              The relatively slow gas diffusion rates in rocks of low porosity at depth have brought the
           contribution of diffusion to long-distance gas migration into question. The half-life of Rn is
           so short that its persistence and  detection after transport by diffusion  over tens  or hundreds
           of metres is extremely unlikely.
              Kristiansson  and  Malmqvist  (1982)  and  Malmqvist  and  Kristiansson  (1984,  1985)
           hypothesise  that,  in  the  zone  of  saturation,  pressure  gradients  and  pressure  shocks  cause
           over-saturation,  leading  to  the  formation  of  gas  bubbles.   These  stream  upward  at  a
           comparatively  rapid  rate  until  they  reach  the  water  table  and  mix  with  the  soil  air.  The
           resulting  mixture  is then  driven  slowly  further upward  by  the  pressure  gradient  caused by
           the bubble stream.
              Any gas that dissolves  in groundwater could,  given the  appropriate  conditions,  migrate
           by  streaming.  Groundwater  is  most  likely to  be  saturated  in  gases  dissolved  in  meteoric
            water, i.e., N2, 02, Ar, CO2. These then are the gases from which bubble  streams may form.
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40