Page 110 - Geology of Carbonate Reservoirs
P. 110

ANATOMY OF DEPOSITIONAL UNITS  91

               depositional anatomy. In this case, both depositional anatomy and diagenetically

               produced microporosity were influenced by antecedent topography. The present

               structural configuration of the area has been modified by syn - to - post - diagenetic salt

               doming. Oolite sand bodies on crests of antecedent structural highs around the
               perimeter of a buried basement feature are altered and productive; those not on
               that paleo - high are unaltered and tight. Although older oolite strata in one of the
               wells are presently high on a salt structure, they are nonporous and were not dia-
               genetically altered to become microporous. This apparent paradox is resolved by
               understanding that the microporosity in the productive, younger oolites was formed
               shortly after deposition above the relatively static, basement high and before salt
               doming lifted the older oolites to their present - day position. These subtle differences
               in sand body anatomy associated with antecedent topography can be mapped to

               facilitate optimum field development. The cause – effect relationships between topog-
               raphy, localized deposition of oolites, diagenesis, and reservoir porosity provide the
               foundation of a geological concept  to use in exploration for additional prospects.

               4.4.1  Facies, Successions, and Sequences

                 The word facies derives from the Latin  facia , meaning face, countenance, or exterior
               appearance. In geology, facies is mainly used to describe the fundamental rock
               properties that characterize depositional units smaller than member rank. It is
               purely a rock - stratigraphic term with no time value. Metamorphic rocks may be

               classified into different metamorphic facies on the basis of the mineral assemblages
               they contain. Biofacies are determined on the basis of fossil content. In sedimentol-
               ogy, facies are determined on depositional rock properties such as texture, constitu-
               ent composition, and sedimentary structures. Sometimes the differences between
               sedimentary facies are not obvious to the unaided eye. Thin section petrography
               may be used in such cases to identify differences in microscopic rock properties
               such as constituent percentages, microscopic pore characteristics, or biological

               microstructures. Facies defined on petrographic data are called  microfacies . Exten-
               sive discussions of microfacies analysis can be found in Flugel  (1982) , and some
               pioneering applications of thin section petrography to establish facies boundaries
               in modern carbonate sediments include Ginsburg  (1956) , Purdy  (1963a) , and Logan
               et al.  (1969) . In his study of modern Bahamian carbonates, Purdy  (1963a)  deter-
               mined microfacies boundaries by applying a statistical procedure called factor anal-
               ysis to constituent point - count data. The resulting  “ reaction groups ”  provided
               objective, but rather abstract, microfacies boundaries. In general practice, facies
               boundaries are determined on estimated percentages of constituents, general
               textural trends, and sedimentary structures.
                    Facies, or more precisely lithofacies, form in depositional environments where
               hydrological and biological processes create genetically distinct associations of
               texture, constituent composition, and sedimentary structures, or lithogenetic units .
               In carbonate reservoirs, those rock properties are generally not distinguishable with
               wireline logs; consequently, the reservoir geologist must examine cuttings or cores
               to accurately identify carbonate facies. If the process – response mechanisms that
               produced the depositional facies are known, then it is possible to work backward
               from data on rock properties to interpret both depositional environment and
               anatomy of the depositional body. Sometimes facies are named for the environment
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115