Page 114 - Geometric Modeling and Algebraic Geometry
P. 114

112    T.-H. Lˆ e and A. Galligo
                           are coincident. It is the self-intersection segment (MP) of the surface in

                                                 [0.6632643380; 1] × [0.1; 0.9]

                           (it is the same in [0; 1] × [0; 1]). The others segments in the figure (2) are phan-
                           tom curves: they correspond to double points of the parameterization Φ(t 1 ,u 1 )=
                           Φ(t 2 ,u 2 ) with (t 1 ,u 1 ) ∈ [0; 1] but (t 2 ,u 2 ) /∈ [0; 1] .
                                                    2
                                                                     2
                           6.7 Conclusion

                           In this paper, we completed the classification of parametric surfaces of bidegree (1,2)
                           over the complex field and over the real field. In a future work,we will also provide
                           some results for the inverse problem: given a candidate (e.g. a segment of a line
                           or of twisted cubic curve), we look for a patch (1,2) which includes this candidate
                           as a subset of its singular locus. For instance we will characterize the ruled surfaces
                           containing a twisted cubic curve and such that all generating lines cut twice the cubic
                           curve, which are indeed parametric surfaces of bidegree (1, 2).


                           Acknowledgements

                           We would like to thank Ragni Piene and the anonymous referees for their com-
                           ments and suggestions. We acknowledge the partial support of the European Projects
                           GAIA II (IST-2001-35512) and of the Network of Excellence Aim@Shape (IST NoE
                           506766).



                           References

                            1. L. Andersson, J. Peters, and N. Stewart, Self-intersection of composite curves and sur-
                              faces, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 15 (1998), pp. 507–527.
                            2. L. Bus´ e and C. D’Andrea, Inversion of parametrized hypersurfaces by means of subresul-
                              tants, preprint, (2004).
                            3. A. Cayley, A second memoir on skew surfaces, otherwise scrolls, Papers, vol 5, (1864),
                              pp. 214–219.
                            4. A. Cayley, A third memoir on skew surfaces, otherwise scrolls, Papers, vol 6, (1868),
                              pp. 312–328.
                            5. E.-W. Chionh and R. N. Goldman, Degree, multiplicity, and inversion formulas for ratio-
                              nal surfaces using u-resultants, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 9 (1992), pp. 93–108.
                            6. A. Coffman, A. J. Schwartz, and C. Stanton, The algebra and geometry of Steiner and
                              other quadratically parametrizable surfaces, Comput. Aided Geom. Des., 13 (1996),
                              pp. 257–286.
                            7. L. Cremona, Sulle superficie gobbe di quarto grado, Memorie dell’Accademia delle
                              Scienze dell’Istituto di Bologna, serie II, tomo 8 (1868), pp. 235–250; Opere, 2, 420.
                            8. T. Dokken, Aspects of Intersection Algorithms and Approximation, Thesis for the doctor
                              philosophias degree, University of Oslo, Norway, 1997.
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119