Page 208 - Global Political Economy_Understanding The International Economic Order
P. 208

SYS TEMS O F POLI TICAL ECONO MY
                              developments in Western Europe have facilitated adoption of the
                              principle of mutual recognition as an expeditious means to promote
                              the economic unification of the Continent.
                                Needless to say, the conditions that exist in Western Europe do not
                              exist anywhere else in the world. Within the North American Free
                              Trade Agreement area, although the United States and Canada are
                              very close in almost every aspect of national life, there is an enormous
                              gap between these countries and Mexico in many respects; the princi-
                              ple of mutual recognition is hardly applicable to NAFTA or to rela-
                              tions between North and South America. The economic, cultural, and
                              political diversity in the Asia/Pacific area is even more striking. The
                              principle of mutual recognition cannot serve as a means toward the
                              economic and political integration of that region and certainly cannot
                              provide the basis for a resolution of differences between the West and
                              these rising economic powers. At the heart of the problems is the fact
                              that economic and political affairs are intimately joined to one an-
                              other. It is therefore difficult to isolate the economy from the polity
                              so that the former may function according to the principles of neo-
                              classical economics. Moreover, if one incorporates religion as a vitally
                              important element in many of these states, as it is in the Middle East,
                              application of the principle of mutual recognition as a solution to the
                              problem of national differences becomes totally out of the question.


                              Conclusion
                              In the early years following the end of the Cold War, there was a
                              prevalent belief that the clash between capitalism and communism
                              would be replaced by a clash between rival forms of capitalism. This
                              belief, at least thus far, has been proved wrong. Yet it is obvious that
                              increasing interdependence of national economies has made legal,
                              policy, and structural differences among national societies both more
                              important and frequently also a source of tension and occasional po-
                              litical conflict. Differing national systems of political economy consti-
                              tute a serious obstacle to the movement toward an even more open
                              multilateral global economy. Differences in such matters as competi-
                              tion policy, business practices, and corporate structures have become
                              major concerns of international trade and other negotiations.







                                                                                      195
   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213