Page 224 - Global Political Economy_Understanding The International Economic Order
P. 224

THE TRADI NG SYS TEM
                              emphasizing “comparative” to emphasizing “competitive” advan-
                              tage, especially in high-tech sectors. International competitiveness and
                              trade patterns frequently result from arbitrary specialization based
                              on increasing returns rather than from efforts to take advantage of
                              fundamental national differences in resources or factor endowment. 20
                              This new thinking about the arbitrary or accidental nature ofinterna-
                              tional specialization and competitiveness emphasizes the increasing
                              importance oftechnology in determining trade patterns. 21  The in-
                              creasing importance oftechnology and of economies ofscale has be-
                              come an important factor in corporate and national economic strate-
                              gies.
                                In 1966, Raymond Vernon’s product cycle theory offoreign direct
                              investment incorporated technology into trade theory; his work fore-
                              shadowed later writings on the importance oftechnological innova-
                                                               22
                              tion for trade and investment patterns. According to Vernon, Ameri-
                              can FDI in the 1960s could be explained primarily as a result of
                              America’s competitive advantage in product innovation and ofthe
                              desire ofAmerican firms to deter or forestall the rise offoreign com-
                              petitors.
                                Additional influential work on the broad subject of the shift from
                              comparative to competitive advantage has been produced by Michael
                              Porter, a professor at Harvard University’s Business School. Through
                              his extensive research, Porter has attempted to explain why the firms
                              ofsome countries have been more competitive in specific industrial
                                                                 23
                              sectors than the firms ofother countries. The United States, for ex-
                              ample, has been very strong in aircraft, while Japan has had an ad-
                              vantage in consumer electronics and automobiles. Through his de-
                              tailed and extensive empirical studies ofthe trading patterns of
                              several countries, Porter found determinants of such patterns, at least
                              among industrialized countries.
                                The central finding ofPorter’s research was that the internal char-
                              acteristics ofa national economy (including what I have identified as
                              the national system of political economy) affect the environment of

                               20
                                 Krugman, Geography and Trade (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991), 7.
                               21
                                 Robert M. Solow, “Growth Theory,” in David Greenaway, Michael Bleaney, and
                              Ian Stewart, eds., Companion to Contemporary Economic Thought (London:
                              Routledge, 1991), 407.
                               22
                                 Raymond Vernon, Sovereignty at Bay (New York: Basic Books, 1971); and Ver-
                              non, “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle,” Quar-
                              terly Journal of Economics 80, no. 2 (May 1966): 190–207.
                               23
                                 Michael E. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations (New York: Free Press,
                              1990).
                                                                                      211
   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229