Page 74 - Global Political Economy_Understanding The International Economic Order
P. 74

NEO CLASS ICAL C ONCEP T OF AN ECONO MY
                              it away. Economists do, however, utilize various techniques to side-
                              step difficulties raised for economic analysis by the unrealistic as-
                              sumptions of their discipline.
                                Economists’ treatment of uncertainty andtechnological change
                              provides a valuable illustration of unrealistic assumptions. Although
                              the profession recognizes technological advance as the most impor-
                              tant determinant of long-term economic growth and hence the most
                              important factor propelling economic change in the modern world,
                              it also acknowledges that technological innovation is uncertain and
                              unpredictable by its very nature. Nevertheless, Gene M. Grossman
                              andElhanan Helpman in their pioneering Innovation and Growth in
                              the Global Economy (1991) explicitly base their analysis of techno-
                              logical advance and its consequences on the unrealistic assumption of
                              certain and complete information about the nature andconsequences
                                                      22
                              of technological innovation. The very nature of technological devel-
                              opments, on the other hand, is that they and their effects are highly
                              unpredictable.
                                From my perspective, one of the most important intellectual limita-
                              tions of economics is its neglect of the role of the state in economic
                              affairs andespecially in international economic developments. The
                              discipline focuses on the behavior and interactions of autonomous
                              individuals and enterprises responding to impersonal market signals.
                              It is obvious, of course, that economists are well aware that national
                              policies andactivities can be relevant for economic outcomes. How-
                              ever, political considerations tendto be either ignoredor conveniently
                                      23
                              forgotten. Economists formulate laws of economic behavior on the
                              assumption that markets count andstates do not.
                                Although many economists acknowledge the unrealistic assump-
                              tions underlying economic science and do their best to transcend
                              them, many andperhaps even most wouldagree with Milton Fried-
                              man’s methodological prescription that it is of no significance
                              whether or not the assumptions underlying economics are realistic. 24
                              What is important, according to Friedman, is whether those assump-
                              tions leadto fruitful propositions that can be tested empirically and
                              thereby shown to be valid or invalid. In other words, do the assump-

                               22
                                 Gene M. Grossman andElhanan Helpman, Innovation and Growth in the Global
                              Economy (Cambridge: MIT Press,1991).
                               23
                                 Benjamin J. Cohen, Organizing the World’s Money: The Political Economy of
                              International Monetary Relations (New York: Basic Books, 1977), 41.
                               24
                                 Milton Friedman, “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in his The Method-
                              ology of Positive Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953), 3–43.
                                                                                       61
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79