Page 110 - Global Tectonics
P. 110

THE FRAMEWORK OF PLATE TECTONICS  97



            contrast, subduction rates around the margins of the   ies, using GPS (Global Positioning System) data
                                             −1

            Pacific are typically between 60 and 95 mm a . Thus the   (Section 5.8). GPS measurements also make it possi-
            oceanic plates of the Pacific are steadily reducing in size   ble to determine the motion of these plates relative

            as they are being consumed at subduction zones at a   to adjacent plates, whereas this is not possible using
            higher rate than they are being created at the East   the techniques based on geologic and geophysical

            Pacific Rise. By contrast, plates containing parts of the   data described above. Most of the poorly defi ned
            Atlantic and Indian oceans are increasing in size. A cor-  zones of deformation surrounding these plates occur
            ollary of this is that the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Carls-  within continental lithosphere, reflecting the profound

            berg Ridge of the northwestern Indian Ocean must be   difference between oceanic and continental litho-
            moving apart. This has important implications for the   sphere and the ways in which they deform (Sections
            nature of the driving mechanism of plate tectonics dis-  2.10, 8.5.1).
            cussed in Chapter 12. Not all ocean ridges spread in a
            direction perpendicular to the strike of their magnetic
            lineations. It may be significant that the major obliqui-  5.4 ABSOLUTE

            ties of this type are found in the more slowly spreading
            areas, in particular the North Atlantic, Gulf of Aden,
            Red Sea, and southwestern Indian Ocean (Plate 4.1  PLATE MOTIONS
            between pp. 244 and 245).
               In contrast to accretionary plate margins, where the
            spreading boundary is typically perpendicular to the   The relative motion between the major plates, averaged
            direction of relative motion, convergent margins are   over the past few million years, can be determined with
            not constrained in this way and the relative motion   remarkable precision, as described in the preceding
            vector typically makes an oblique angle with the plate   section. It would be of considerable interest, particu-
            boundary. Extreme examples, with very high obliquity,   larly in relation to the driving mechanism for plate
            occur at the western end of the Aleutian arc and the   motions, if the motion of plates, and indeed plate
            northern end of the Indonesian arc (Fig. 5.5). In subduc-  boundaries, across the face of the Earth could also be
            tion zones therefore, in addition to the component of   determined. If the motion of any one plate or plate
            motion perpendicular to the plate boundary, that pro-  boundary across the surface of the Earth is known, then
            duces underthrusting, there will be a component of   the motion of all other plates and plate boundaries can
            relative motion parallel to the plate boundary. This   be determined because the relative motions are known.
            “trench parallel” component often gives rise to strike-  In general, within the framework of plate tectonics, all
            slip faulting within the overriding plate immediately   plates and plate boundaries must move across the face
            landward of the forearc region. As a consequence, focal   of the Earth. If one or more plates and/or plate bound-
            mechanism solutions, for earthquakes occurring on the   aries are stationary, then this is fortuitous. A particular
            interface between the two plates beneath the forearc   point on a plate, or, less likely, on a plate boundary, will
            region, do not yield the true direction of motion   be stationary if the Euler vector of the motion of that
            between the plates. They tend to underestimate the   plate or plate boundary passes through that point
            trench parallel component of motion because part of   (Fig. 5.6).
            this is taken up by the strike-slip faulting (DeMets et al.,   The absolute motion of plates is much more diffi -

            1990). Classic examples of such trench parallel strike-  cult to define than the relative motion between plates
            slip faults include the Philippine Fault, the Median Tec-  at plate boundaries, not least because the whole solid
            tonic Line of southwest Japan (Section 9.9), and the   Earth is in a dynamic state. It is generally agreed that
            Atacama Fault and the Liquiñe–Ofqui Fault (Section   absolute plate motions should specify the motion of
            10.2.3) in Chile.                            the lithosphere relative to the lower mantle as this
               As indicated in Fig. 5.5, approximately 15% of the   accounts for 70% of the mass of the solid Earth and
            Earth’s surface is covered by regions of deforming   deforms more slowly than the asthenosphere above
            lithosphere; for example in the Alpine–Himalayan   and the outer core below. In theory if the lithosphere
            belt, southeast Asia, and western North America.   and asthenosphere were everywhere of the same
            Within these areas it is now possible to identify addi-  thickness and effective viscosity, there would be no net
            tional small plates, albeit often with diffuse boundar-  torque on the plates and hence no net rotation of the
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115