Page 299 - Glucose Monitoring Devices
P. 299

306    CHAPTER 15 Automated closed-loop insulin delivery





                         where L and K denote the extended controllability matrices L ¼ A p 1 B . AB B

                         and K ¼ A p 1 K . AK K and assuming that the state transition matrix is nilpotent
                                      p
                         with degree p (A ¼ 0), that is the contribution of the initial state b x k p is negligible
                         for sufficiently large p, the predicted state can be expressed as
                                                 b x k ¼ Lu k p;p þ Ky k p;p
                            Premultiplying the predicted state by the observability matrix G gives
                                               Gb x k ¼ GLu k p;p þ GKy k p;p
                         with
                                                           C
                                                       2        3
                                                           CA
                                                       6        7
                                                       6        7
                                                            «
                                                    G ¼ 6       7
                                                       4        5
                                                         CA p 1
                            The product of the matrices GL and GK can be constructed from the VARX
                         model coefficient matrices as
                                                   u     u           u
                                                2 q k p  q k pþ1  / q
                                                                     k 1 3
                                                6         u          u
                                                   0
                                                6        q k p  / q     7
                                                6                    k 2 7
                                           GL ¼ 6                       7
                                                6     «  «      1    «  5
                                                4
                                                      0  0           u
                                                                / q  k f
                         and
                                                   y     y           y
                                                2               /
                                                  q k p  q k pþ1    q k 1 3
                                                6
                                                          y          y
                                                6   0           /       7
                                                6        q k p      q k 2 7
                                                6                       7
                                           GK ¼
                                                6               1     «  7
                                                6     «  «              5
                                                4
                                                      0  0      /    y
                                                                     k f
                                                                    q
                         where f is the user-specified parameter for the future window length.
                            Therefore after estimating the VARX coefficient matrices, the estimated coeffi-
                                     u     y
                         cient matrices q and q can be used to determine all quantities on the right-hand side
                         of the state evolution equation, and an SVD can be used to readily obtain a low-rank
                         approximation of the state sequence. For recursive identification, a selection matrix
                         S of appropriate dimensions can be determined such that the basis of the state esti-
                         mation is consistent at each sampling time as

                                             b x k ¼ S k W k GLu k p;p þ GKy k p;p
   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304